String CHILDREN_COMBINATION_APPEND = XmlService.CHILDREN_COMBINATION_APPEND;

    /**
     * This default mode for combining children DOMs during merge means that where element names match, the process will
     * try to merge the element data, rather than putting the dominant and recessive elements (which share the same
     * element name) as siblings in the resulting DOM.
     */

        run: |
          echo 'KERNEL=="kvm", GROUP="kvm", MODE="0666", OPTIONS+="static_node=kvm"' | sudo tee /etc/udev/rules.d/99-kvm4all.rules
          sudo udevadm control --reload-rules
          sudo udevadm trigger --name-match=kvm

      - name: Setup Gradle
        uses: gradle/actions/setup-gradle@v4

      - name: Gradle cache
        run: ./gradlew :android-test:test

      - name: AVD cache

        // setup condition
        cb.query().addOrderBy_LastAccessTime_Desc();

        buildSearchCondition(failureUrlPager, cb);
    }

    /**
     * Deletes all failure URLs that match the criteria specified in the pager.
     *
     * @param failureUrlPager the pager containing deletion criteria
     */
    public void deleteAll(final FailureUrlPager failureUrlPager) {

          // yes, that's a lot of sinks!
          sinks.add(new Sink(chunkSize, bufferSize));
          // For convenience, testing only with big endianness, to match DataOutputStream.
          // I regard highly unlikely that both the little endianness tests above and this one
          // passes, and there is still a little endianness bug lurking around.
        }
      }

      A finalAccum = scheme.result(collector, inputs);
      if (collector.characteristics().contains(Collector.Characteristics.IDENTITY_FINISH)) {
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // `R` and `A` match for an `IDENTITY_FINISH`
        R result = (R) finalAccum;
        assertEquivalent(expectedResult, result);
      }
      assertEquivalent(expectedResult, collector.finisher().apply(finalAccum));
    }
  }

        // Cleanup should not throw exception
        assertDoesNotThrow(() -> bufferManager.cleanup());

        // After cleanup, all regions should be released (but the count may not match exactly
        // if some regions were pooled rather than immediately released)
        assertTrue(bufferManager.getTotalReleased() > 0, "Some regions should be released during cleanup");

Doch dann versuchen es die Angreifer mit dem Benutzernamen `stanleyjobsox` und dem Passwort `love123`.

Und Ihr Anwendungscode macht etwa Folgendes:

```Python
if "stanleyjobsox" == "stanleyjobson" and "love123" == "swordfish":
    ...
```

  integrity sha512-8+9WqebbFzpX9OR+Wa6O29asIogeRMzcGtAINdpMHHyAg10f05aSFVBbcEqGf/PXw1EjAZ+q2/bEBg3DvurK3Q==

balanced-match@^1.0.0:
  version "1.0.2"
  resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/balanced-match/-/balanced-match-1.0.2.tgz#e83e3a7e3f300b34cb9d87f615fa0cbf357690ee"
  integrity sha512-3oSeUO0TMV67hN1AmbXsK4yaqU7tjiHlbxRDZOpH0KW9+CeX4bRAaX0Anxt0tx2MrpRpWwQaPwIlISEJhYU5Pw==

    val header = userResponse.header("Retry-After") ?: return defaultDelay

    // https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.3
    // currently ignores a HTTP-date, and assumes any non int 0 is a delay
    if (header.matches("\\d+".toRegex())) {
      return Integer.valueOf(header)
    }
    return Integer.MAX_VALUE
  }

  companion object {
    /**

        byte[] buf = new byte[2 + 2 + 2 + 4 + 2 + filename.length() + 1];
        int n = next.writeParametersWireFormat(buf, 0);
        assertEquals(buf.length, n, "Parameter bytes written should match expected length");
        // informationLevel LE at offset 4..5
        assertEquals((byte) 0x04, buf[4]);
        assertEquals((byte) 0x01, buf[5]);
    }

    /**