*       unnecessary; for example, {@code copyOf(copyOf(anArrayList))} should copy the data only
 *       once. This reduces the expense of habitually making defensive copies at API boundaries.
 *       However, the precise conditions for skipping the copy operation are undefined.
 *   <li><b>Warning:</b> a view collection such as {@link ImmutableMap#keySet} or {@link

 * error message template strings. This only supports the {@code "%s"} specifier, not the full range
 * of {@link java.util.Formatter} specifiers. However, note that if the number of arguments does not
 * match the number of occurrences of {@code "%s"} in the format string, {@code Verify} will still

 */
    public boolean equals( Object obj ) {

// The API Server will fail validation of all requests that attempt to mutate
// the Data field. ControllerRevisions may, however, be deleted. Note that, due to its use by both
// the DaemonSet and StatefulSet controllers for update and rollback, this object is beta. However,
// it may be subject to name and representation changes in future releases, and clients should not

 * for further instructions. Whenever possible, you should change any references of type {@code
 * Ordering} to be of type {@code Comparator} instead. However, at this time we have no plan to
 * <i>deprecate</i> this class.
 *
 * <p>Many replacements involve adopting {@code Stream}, and these changes can sometimes make your

        .containsExactly(0, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21)
        .inOrder();
  }

  public void testCopyOf_array_empty() {
    /*
     * We don't guarantee the same-as property, so we aren't obligated to test it. However, it's
     * useful in testing - when two things are the same then one can't have bugs the other doesn't.
     */
    assertThat(ImmutableIntArray.copyOf(new int[0])).isSameInstanceAs(ImmutableIntArray.of());
  }

        .containsExactly(0.0, 1.0, 3.0, 6.0, 10.0, 15.0, 21.0)
        .inOrder();
  }

  public void testCopyOf_array_empty() {
    /*
     * We don't guarantee the same-as property, so we aren't obligated to test it. However, it's
     * useful in testing - when two things are the same then one can't have bugs the other doesn't.
     */
    assertThat(ImmutableDoubleArray.copyOf(new double[0]))
        .isSameInstanceAs(ImmutableDoubleArray.of());

 * java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject AccessibleObject} and {@link
 * java.lang.reflect.GenericDeclaration GenericDeclaration}. Since version 31.0 that is no longer
 * the case. However, most methods from those types are present with the same signature in this
 * class.
 *
 * @param <T> the type that owns this method or constructor.

Delete marker replication is allowed in [AWS V1 Configuration](https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/storage/managing-delete-marker-replication-in-amazon-s3/) but not in V2 configuration. The MinIO implementation above is based on V2 configuration, however it has been extended to allow both DeleteMarker replication and replication of versioned deletes with the `DeleteMarkerReplication` and `DeleteReplication` fields in the replication configuration above. By default, this is set to `Disabled` unless...

    ```

    **Note:** You can add `--test_sharding_strategy=disabled` to the `flags` to
    disable the sharding so that all the test outputs are in one file. However,
    it may slow down the tests for not running in parallel and may cause the
    test to timeout but it could be useful when you need to execute a single
    test or more in general your filtered/selected tests have a very low