community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually the *best* way to address
        the real use case, or whether or not a different abstraction might be more appropriate.


        It's okay if you can't provide complete context on a use case. We understand if you are not
        able to discuss the full details of what you're working on.

                        </repository>
                    </repositories>
                </project>
                """);

            // Create child2 with different repository
            Path child2Dir = tempDir.resolve("child2");
            Files.createDirectories(child2Dir);
            Path child2Pom = child2Dir.resolve("pom.xml");
            Files.writeString(child2Pom, """

    private static final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(QueryProcessor.class);

    /**
     * Map of query commands indexed by query class simple names.
     * Used to lookup appropriate command handlers for different query types.
     */
    protected Map<String, QueryCommand> queryCommandMap = new HashMap<>();

    /**
     * List of filters that will be applied during query processing.

                assertEquals("image/jpeg", mimeMap.getMimeType("jpg"));
            }
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle rapid succession of different extensions")
        void testRapidDifferentExtensions() throws IOException {
            String[] extensions = { "pdf", "doc", "xls", "html", "jpg", "gif", "png", "txt", "xml", "css" };

 *   <li>comparing each object against an instance of an incompatible class returns false
 *   <li>comparing each pair of objects within the same equality group returns true
 *   <li>comparing each pair of objects from different equality groups returns false
 *   <li>the hash codes of any two equal objects are equal
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>When a test fails, the error message labels the objects involved in the failed comparison as
 * follows:
 *

        // First access
        helper.setProperty(bean1, "directField", String.class, config);
        boolean accessibilityAfterFirst = field.canAccess(bean1);

        // Second access with different bean
        config.setValue("value2");
        helper.setProperty(bean2, "directField", String.class, config);
        boolean accessibilityAfterSecond = field.canAccess(bean2);

	}
	if len(b) > 0 && !strings.HasSuffix(b, slashSeparator) {
		b += slashSeparator
	}
	return b
}

// update cache with new status.
// The updates are conditional so multiple callers can update with different states.
func (m *metacache) update(update metacache) {
	now := UTCNow()
	m.lastUpdate = now

	if update.lastHandout.After(m.lastHandout) {
		m.lastHandout = update.lastUpdate
		if m.lastHandout.After(now) {

   *
   * Prior to OkHttp 3.3.1 we accepted either form and consider them equivalent. And since OkHttp
   * 3.7.0 this is also true. But OkHttp 3.3.1 through 3.6.0 treated these as different.
   */
  @Test
  fun forJavaName_fromLegacyEnumName() {
    // These would have been considered equal in OkHttp 3.3.1, but now aren't.
    assertThat(forJavaName("SSL_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5"))

import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Objects;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Used to represent the order of elements in a data structure that supports different options for
 * iteration order guarantees.
 *
 * <p>Example usage:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * MutableGraph<Integer> graph =
 *     GraphBuilder.directed().nodeOrder(ElementOrder.<Integer>natural()).build();
 * }
 *

    char[] charsB = new char[128];

    for (int i = 0; i < charsA.length; i++) {
      if (i < 100) {
        charsA[i] = 'a';
        charsB[i] = 'a';
      } else {
        // Both two-byte characters, but must be different
        charsA[i] = (char) (0x0180 + i);
        charsB[i] = (char) (0x0280 + i);
      }
    }

    String stringA = new String(charsA);
    String stringB = new String(charsB);