/*
   * TODO: consider adding MultisetFeatures.SUPPORTS_SET_COUNT. Currently we
   * assume that using setCount() to increase the count is permitted iff add()
   * is permitted and similarly for decrease/remove(). We assume that a
   * setCount() no-op is permitted if either add() or remove() is permitted,
   * though we also allow it to "succeed" if neither is permitted.
   */

   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if
   * likewise not type-checked)? Could our single caller do something different?
   */
  @SuppressWarnings({"nullness", "unchecked"})

 * sum that is used for purposes such as collecting statistics, not for fine-grained synchronization
 * control. Under low update contention, the two classes have similar characteristics. But under
 * high contention, expected throughput of this class is significantly higher, at the expense of
 * higher space consumption.
 *

@GwtCompatible
abstract class CollectionFuture<V extends @Nullable Object, C extends @Nullable Object>
    extends AggregateFuture<V, C> {
  /*
   * We access this field racily but safely. For discussion of a similar situation, see the comments
   * on the fields of TimeoutFuture. This field is slightly different from the fields discussed
   * there: cancel() never reads this field, only writes to it. That makes the race here completely

/**
 * API action for admin duplicate host management.
 * Provides RESTful API endpoints for managing duplicate host settings in the Fess search engine.
 * Duplicate host settings help prevent indexing the same content from multiple similar URLs.
 *
 */
public class ApiAdminDuplicatehostAction extends FessApiAdminAction {

    private static final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(ApiAdminDuplicatehostAction.class);

/**
 * A {@link FutureTask} that also implements the {@link ListenableFuture} interface. Unlike {@code
 * FutureTask}, {@code ListenableFutureTask} does not provide an overrideable {@link
 * FutureTask#done() done()} method. For similar functionality, call {@link #addListener}.
 *
 * <p>Few users should use this class. It is intended primarily for those who are implementing an

          submittingTaskQueue.nextTask = task;
          // requireNonNull(delegate) is safe for reasons similar to requireNonNull(sequencer).
          submittingTaskQueue.nextExecutor = requireNonNull(delegate);
          delegate = null;
        } else {
          // requireNonNull(delegate) is safe for reasons similar to requireNonNull(sequencer).
          Executor localDelegate = requireNonNull(delegate);
          delegate = null;

    public Map<String, String[]> fields = new HashMap<>();

    /** The conditions. */
    public Map<String, String[]> as = new HashMap<>();

    /** The extra queries. */
    public String[] ex_q;

    /** The similar document hash. */
    public String sdh;

    @Override
    public String getQuery() {
        return q;
    }

    @Override
    public String[] getExtraQueries() {

     */
    @ValidateTypeFailure
    public Integer offset;

    /**
     * The page number for pagination.
     */
    @ValidateTypeFailure
    public Integer pn;

    /**
     * Similar document hash for finding related documents.
     */
    @Size(max = 1000)
    public String sdh;

    /**
     * Parameter to control tracking of total hits in search results.
     */
    @Size(max = 100)

 * multimap.put(key1, foo);
 * multimap.put(key2, bar);
 * multimap.put(key1, baz);
 * }
 *
 * ... the iteration order for {@link #keys()} is {@code [key1, key2, key1]}, and similarly for
 * {@link #entries()}. Unlike {@link LinkedHashMultimap}, the iteration order is kept consistent
 * between keys, entries and values. For example, calling:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * multimap.remove(key1, foo);
 * }
 *