SmbComTransaction result = transaction.nextElement();

        assertSame(transaction, result);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test pad calculation with various offsets")
    void testPadCalculation() {
        // Test pad calculation with different alignment values
        assertEquals(0, transaction.pad(0)); // Already aligned
        assertEquals(0, transaction.pad(4)); // Already aligned

        Encodable mockInfo = mock(Encodable.class);
        when(mockInfo.size()).thenReturn(100);
        request.setInfo(mockInfo);

        int size = request.size();

        // Expected size calculation: size8(SMB2_HEADER_LENGTH + 32 + info.size())
        // size8 rounds up to nearest multiple of 8
        int expectedRawSize = Smb2Constants.SMB2_HEADER_LENGTH + 32 + 100;

        // When
        boolean isCancel = request.isCancel();

        // Then
        assertTrue(isCancel, "Should identify itself as a cancel request");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test size calculation")
    void testSize() {
        // Given
        Smb2CancelRequest request = new Smb2CancelRequest(mockConfig, 1L, 0L);

        // When
        int size = request.size();

        // Then

- The calculations for Pod topology spread skew now exclude nodes that
  don't match the node affinity/selector. This may lead to unschedulable pods if you previously had pods

1em,\n    \"%\": 1%\n  );\n  @if ($dividend-unit != $divisor-unit and map-has-key($unit-map, $dividend-unit)) {\n    $result: $result * map-get($unit-map, $dividend-unit);\n  }\n  @return $result;\n}\n\n// Remove px-unit from $rfs-base-font-size for calculations\n@if $rfs-base-font-size-unit == \"px\" {\n  $rfs-base-font-size: divide($rfs-base-font-size, $rfs-base-font-size * 0 + 1);\n}\n@else if $rfs-base-font-size-unit == \"rem\" {\n  $rfs-base-font-size: divide($rfs-base-font-size, divide($rfs-base-font-size...

     * of the child. The general idea is to adjust inherited URLs to match the project layout (in SCM).
     *
     * <p>This calculation is only a heuristic based on our conventions.
     * In detail, the algo relies on the following assumptions: <ul>
     * <li>The parent uses aggregation and refers to the child via the modules section</li>

		return
	}

	duration := endTime.Sub(m.startTime)

	bytesSinceLastWindow := atomic.SwapUint64(&m.bytesSinceLastWindow, 0)

	if m.expMovingAvg == 0 {
		// Should address initial calculation and should be fine for resuming from 0
		m.expMovingAvg = float64(bytesSinceLastWindow) / duration.Seconds()
		return
	}

	increment := float64(bytesSinceLastWindow) / duration.Seconds()

scanner               manage namespace scanning for usage calculation, lifecycle, healing and more
```

> NOTE: if you set any of the following sub-system configuration using ENVs, dynamic behavior is not supported.

### Usage scanner

        assertEquals(8, emptyContext.size()); // Minimum size
        assertFalse(emptyContext.supportsAlgorithm(CompressionNegotiateContext.COMPRESSION_LZ77));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test context size calculation")
    public void testContextSize() {
        int expectedSize = 8 + (3 * 2); // Header + 3 algorithms * 2 bytes each
        assertEquals(expectedSize, context.size());
    }

    @Test

    void testConstructorWithNameOnly() {
        // Test with simple pipe name
        String pipeName = "TestPipe";
        FsctlPipeWaitRequest request = new FsctlPipeWaitRequest(pipeName);

        // Verify size calculation
        int expectedSize = 14 + pipeName.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_16LE).length;
        assertEquals(expectedSize, request.size());
    }

    @Test