String[] roleNames = ldapUser.getRoleNames();
        assertNotNull(roleNames);
        assertEquals(0, roleNames.length);
    }

    public void test_getGroupNames() {
        // Test getting group names from permissions
        ComponentUtil.setFessConfig(new FessConfig.SimpleImpl() {
            @Override
            public String getRoleSearchGroupPrefix() {
                return "G";
            }

{* ../../docs_src/path_params/tutorial005.py hl[16] *}

### Testen Sie es in der API-Dokumentation

Weil die erlaubten Werte für den *Pfad-Parameter* nun vordefiniert sind, kann die interaktive Dokumentation sie als Auswahl-Drop-Down anzeigen:

<img src="/img/tutorial/path-params/image03.png">

### Mit Python-*<abbr title="Enumeration – Aufzählung">Enums</abbr>* arbeiten

            names.names[0].sid_type = (short) jcifs.SID.SID_TYPE_USER;
            names.names[0].name = new UnicodeString("alice", false);
            names.names[0].sid_index = 0;
            // Second is a domain group
            names.names[1] = new lsarpc.LsarTranslatedName();
            names.names[1].sid_type = (short) jcifs.SID.SID_TYPE_DOM_GRP;
            names.names[1].name = new UnicodeString("Domain Users", false);

      args.add(generateDummyArg(param, generator));
    }
    Object instance = createInstance(factory, args);
    List<Object> equalArgs = generateEqualFactoryArguments(factory, params, args);
    // Each group is a List of items, each item has a list of factory args.
    List<List<List<Object>>> argGroups = new ArrayList<>();
    argGroups.add(ImmutableList.of(args, equalArgs));
    EqualsTester tester =
        new EqualsTester(

      encodings[ 0x1a] = encoding // Substitute
      encodings[ 0x1b] = encoding // Escape
      encodings[ 0x1c] = encoding // File Separator
      encodings[ 0x1d] = encoding // Group Separator
      encodings[ 0x1e] = encoding // Record Separator
      encodings[ 0x1f] = encoding // Unit Separator
      encodings[ 0x7f] = encoding // Delete
    }

  fun nonAscii(encoding: Encoding) =
    apply {

	}
	DB.Create(&users)

	var results []User
	DB.Select("AVG(age) as avgage").Where("name LIKE ?", "subquery_having%").Group("name").Having("AVG(age) > (?)", DB.
		Select("AVG(age)").Where("name LIKE ?", "subquery_having%").Table("users")).Find(&results)

	if len(results) != 2 {
		t.Errorf("Two user group should be found, instead found %d", len(results))
	}
}

func TestScanNullValue(t *testing.T) {

		if _, ok := db.Statement.Clauses["GROUP BY"]; !ok {
			delete(tx.Statement.Clauses, "ORDER BY")
			defer func() {
				tx.Statement.Clauses["ORDER BY"] = orderByClause
			}()
		}
	}

	tx.Statement.Dest = count
	tx = tx.callbacks.Query().Execute(tx)

	if _, ok := db.Statement.Clauses["GROUP BY"]; ok || tx.RowsAffected != 1 {
		*count = tx.RowsAffected
	}

	return

    private fun computeCandidate(): CacheStrategy {
      // No cached response.
      if (cacheResponse == null) {
        return CacheStrategy(request, null)
      }

      // Drop the cached response if it's missing a required handshake.
      if (request.isHttps && cacheResponse.handshake == null) {
        return CacheStrategy(request, null)
      }

      } else {
        // Otherwise the rule is for a public suffix, so we must take one more label.
        domainLabels.size - (rule.size + 1)
      }

    return splitDomain(domain).asSequence().drop(firstLabelOffset).joinToString(".")
  }

  private fun splitDomain(domain: String): List<String> {
    val domainLabels = domain.split('.')

    if (domainLabels.last() == "") {

    // in the opposite order from how they were added so we need to reverse the list to fulfill our
    // contract.
    // This is somewhat annoying, but turns out to be very fast in practice. Alternatively, we could
    // drop the contract on the method that enforces this queue like behavior since depending on it
    // is likely to be a bug anyway.

    // N.B. All writes to the list and the next pointers must have happened before the above