Doc(
                """
                Configuration passed to Pydantic to define if the response data should
                exclude fields set to `None`.

                This is much simpler (less smart) than `response_model_exclude_unset`
                and `response_model_exclude_defaults`. You probably want to use one of
                those two instead of this one, as those allow returning `None` values

  /**
   * This strategy uses all 128 bits of {@link Hashing#murmur3_128} when hashing. It looks different
   * from the implementation in MURMUR128_MITZ_32 because we're avoiding the multiplication in the
   * loop and doing a (much simpler) += hash2. We're also changing the index to a positive number by
   * AND'ing with Long.MAX_VALUE instead of flipping the bits.
   */
  MURMUR128_MITZ_64() {
    @Override

 * multimap.put(key1, foo);
 * multimap.put(key2, bar);
 * multimap.put(key1, baz);
 * }
 *
 * ... the iteration order for {@link #keys()} is {@code [key1, key2, key1]}, and similarly for
 * {@link #entries()}. Unlike {@link LinkedHashMultimap}, the iteration order is kept consistent
 * between keys, entries and values. For example, calling:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * multimap.remove(key1, foo);
 * }
 *

   * during which the {@code RateLimiter} smoothly ramps up its rate, until it reaches its maximum
   * rate at the end of the period (as long as there are enough requests to saturate it). Similarly,
   * if the {@code RateLimiter} is left <i>unused</i> for a duration of {@code warmupPeriod}, it
   * will gradually return to its "cold" state, i.e. it will go through the same warming up process

* L'élément auquel le client tentait d'accéder n'existe pas.
* etc.

Dans ces cas, vous retournez normalement un **code d'état HTTP** dans la plage de **400** (de 400 à 499).

C'est similaire aux codes d'état HTTP 200 (de 200 à 299). Ces codes « 200 » signifient que, d'une certaine manière, la requête a été un « succès ».

Les codes d'état dans la plage des 400 signifient qu'il y a eu une erreur côté client.

You can build your own connection spec with a custom set of TLS versions and cipher suites. For example, this configuration is limited to three highly-regarded cipher suites. Its drawback is that it requires Android 5.0+ and a similarly current webserver.

```java
ConnectionSpec spec = new ConnectionSpec.Builder(ConnectionSpec.MODERN_TLS)
    .tlsVersions(TlsVersion.TLS_1_2)
    .cipherSuites(

So we have a dedicated thread for every socket that just reads frames and dispatches them.

The reader thread must never run application-layer code. Otherwise one slow stream can hold up the entire connection.

  /*
   * TODO: consider adding MultisetFeatures.SUPPORTS_SET_COUNT. Currently we
   * assume that using setCount() to increase the count is permitted iff add()
   * is permitted and similarly for decrease/remove(). We assume that a
   * setCount() no-op is permitted if either add() or remove() is permitted,
   * though we also allow it to "succeed" if neither is permitted.
   */

    * JSON nesneleri (`dict`).
    * Eleman tipleri tanımlanan JSON dizileri (`list`).
    * Minimum ve maksimum uzunlukları tanımlanan String (`str`) alanları.
    * Min ve max değerleri olan sayılar (`int`, `float`) vb.

* Daha “egzotik” tipler için doğrulama:
    * URL.
    * Email.
    * UUID.
    * ...ve diğerleri.

Tüm doğrulama köklü ve sağlam **Pydantic** tarafından yapılır.

        // For this test, we'll simulate that no auth header means we should challenge
        // Since we can't mock the internal transport operations easily without real network,
        // we'll test the simpler case where no NTLM negotiation is needed
        when(request.getHeader("Authorization")).thenReturn(null);

        filter.doFilter(request, response, filterChain);

        // Should challenge the client