</div>
            </la:form>
        </section>
    </main>
    <jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/footer.jsp"></jsp:include>
</div>
<jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/foot.jsp"></jsp:include>
<script src="${fe:url('/js/admin/plugins/form-validator/jquery.form-validator.min.js')}"
        type="text/javascript"></script>

    assertTrue(asList(entrySetToArray1).containsAll(entrySet));

    Entry<?, ?>[] entrySetToArray2 = new Entry<?, ?>[map.size() + 2];
    entrySetToArray2[map.size()] = mapEntry("foo", 1);
    assertSame(entrySetToArray2, entrySet.toArray(entrySetToArray2));
    assertNull(entrySetToArray2[map.size()]);
    assertTrue(asList(entrySetToArray2).containsAll(entrySet));

   *
   * {@snippet :
   * static final ImmutableTable<Integer, Character, String> SPREADSHEET =
   *     new ImmutableTable.Builder<Integer, Character, String>()
   *         .put(1, 'A', "foo")
   *         .put(1, 'B', "bar")
   *         .put(2, 'A', "baz")
   *         .buildOrThrow();
   * }
   *
   * <p>By default, the order in which cells are added to the builder determines the iteration

                "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?>\n" + "<urlset xmlns=\"http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9\">\n"
                        + "  <url>\n" + "    <loc><![CDATA[http://www.example.com/page?foo=bar&baz=qux]]></loc>\n"
                        + "    <lastmod>2025-01-01</lastmod>\n" + "  </url>\n" + "</urlset>";
        final InputStream in = new ByteArrayInputStream(xml.getBytes());

     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?
     *

    }
    assertNoMorePermutations(permutations);
  }

  public void testToStringImplWithNullEntries() throws Exception {
    List<@Nullable String> list = new ArrayList<>();
    list.add("foo");
    list.add(null);

    assertEquals(list.toString(), Collections2.toStringImpl(list));
  }

  }

  public void testRemoveFromStringHeap() {
    MinMaxPriorityQueue<String> mmHeap =
        rawtypeToWildcard(MinMaxPriorityQueue.expectedSize(5)).create();
    Collections.addAll(mmHeap, "foo", "bar", "foobar", "barfoo", "larry", "sergey", "eric");
    assertTrue("Heap is not intact initially", mmHeap.isIntact());
    assertEquals("bar", mmHeap.peek());
    assertEquals("sergey", mmHeap.peekLast());

     * the other. From the declaration syntax, the class type parameter appears first, but the call
     * syntax may show up in opposite order such as {@code new <A>Foo<B>()}.
     */
    @Override
    public final TypeVariable<?>[] getTypeParameters() {
      TypeVariable<?>[] declaredByClass = getDeclaringClass().getTypeParameters();

   *
   * {@snippet :
   * static final ImmutableTable<Integer, Character, String> SPREADSHEET =
   *     new ImmutableTable.Builder<Integer, Character, String>()
   *         .put(1, 'A', "foo")
   *         .put(1, 'B', "bar")
   *         .put(2, 'A', "baz")
   *         .buildOrThrow();
   * }
   *
   * <p>By default, the order in which cells are added to the builder determines the iteration

 *   <li>Supports a copy-free {@link #subArray} view, so methods that accept this type don't need to
 *       add overloads that accept start and end indexes.
 *   <li>Can be streamed without "breaking the chain": {@code foo.getBarInts().stream()...}.
 *   <li>Access to all collection-based utilities via {@link #asList} (though at the cost of
 *       allocating garbage).
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>