InternetDomainName.from("j\u00f8rpeland.no");
  private static final InternetDomainName PUNYCODE_EXAMPLE =
      InternetDomainName.from("xn--jrpeland-54a.no");

  /** The Greek letter delta, used in unicode testing. */
  private static final String DELTA = "\u0394";

  /** A domain part which is valid under lenient validation, but invalid under strict validation. */

            super(config);
            this.extended = extended;
            this.fileType = fileType;
        }

        // Use setter methods to configure extended and fileType in parent class
        public void configureForTest(boolean extended, int fileType) {
            setExtended(extended);
            this.fileType = fileType;
        }

...这是因为客户端生成器会把每个*路径操作*的 OpenAPI 内部**操作 ID（operation ID）**用作方法名的一部分。

OpenAPI 要求每个操作 ID 在所有*路径操作*中都是唯一的，因此 FastAPI 会使用**函数名**、**路径**和**HTTP 方法/操作**来生成操作 ID，以确保其唯一性。

接下来我会告诉你如何改进。🤓

## 自定义操作 ID 与更好的方法名 { #custom-operation-ids-and-better-method-names }

你可以**修改**这些操作 ID 的**生成**方式，使之更简单，从而在客户端中得到**更简洁的方法名**。

在这种情况下，你需要用其他方式确保每个操作 ID 依然是**唯一**的。

例如，你可以确保每个*路径操作*都有一个标签，然后基于**标签**和*路径操作***名称**（函数名）来生成操作 ID。

 * </ul>
 *
 * Guava contains a number of other multimap implementations, such as {@link ArrayListMultimap}. In
 * new code, we recommend using {@link MultimapBuilder} instead: It provides better control of how
 * keys and values are stored.
 *
 * <h3>Other Notes</h3>
 *
 * <p>As with {@code Map}, the behavior of a {@code Multimap} is not specified if key objects

         */
        for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) {
            switch (state) {
            case 0:
                if (in[i] != '/') {
                    // Checked exception (e.g. MalformedURLException) would be better
                    // but this would be a nightmare API wise
                    throw new RuntimeCIFSException("Invalid smb: URL: " + this.url);
                }
                out[prefixLen] = in[i];

labels.chat_step_intent=Analyseren
labels.chat_step_search=Zoeken
labels.chat_step_evaluate=Evalueren
labels.chat_step_fetch=Ophalen
labels.chat_step_answer=Antwoorden
labels.chat_input_hint=Enter om te verzenden, Shift+Enter voor nieuwe regel
labels.chat_send=Bericht verzenden
labels.chat_retry=Opnieuw proberen
labels.chat_dismiss=Sluiten
labels.chat_copied=Gekopieerd!
labels.chat_copy_failed=Kopiëren mislukt

          addToMap();
        }
      }
      return changed;
    }

    @Nullable WrappedCollection getAncestor() {
      return ancestor;
    }

    // The following methods are provided for better performance.

    @Override
    public boolean addAll(Collection<? extends V> collection) {
      if (collection.isEmpty()) {
        return false;
      }
      int oldSize = size(); // calls refreshIfEmpty

   *     directly, or use a combination of {@link #throwIfUnchecked} and {@code throw new
   *     RuntimeException(e)}. But consider whether users would be better off if your API threw a
   *     different type of exception. For background on the deprecation, read <a
   *     href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/Why-we-deprecated-Throwables.propagate">Why we

 *       method to obtain a correctly-sized copy.
 *   <li>The performance of using the associated {@code Builder} class can be assumed to be no
 *       worse, and possibly better, than creating a mutable collection and copying it.
 *   <li>Implementations generally do not cache hash codes. If your element or key type has a slow
 *       {@code hashCode} implementation, it should cache it itself.
 * </ul>

  }

  /**
   * Returns a new builder with a hint for how many distinct keys are expected to be added. The
   * generated builder is equivalent to that returned by {@link #builder}, but may perform better if
   * {@code expectedKeys} is a good estimate.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code expectedKeys} is negative
   * @since 33.3.0
   */