}
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @CsvSource({ "0x00, 0x00000000", "0x01, 0x00000001", "0x03, 0x0000000F", "0xFF, 0x7FFFFFFF" })
    @DisplayName("Should handle various security modes and capabilities")
    void testVariousSecurityModesAndCapabilities(String securityModeHex, String capabilitiesHex) throws Exception {
        // Given
        int securityMode = Integer.decode(securityModeHex);

            System.arraycopy(name.getBytes("US-ASCII"), 0, src, srcIndex + 1 + (i * 18), 16);
            src[srcIndex + 1 + (i * 18) + 15] = (byte) i; // Different hex codes
            src[srcIndex + 1 + (i * 18) + 16] = 0x04; // Active flag
        }

        // MAC address
        int macOffset = srcIndex + 1 + (18 * numNames);

        tag1.setCss("highlight");

        PrunedTag tag2 = new PrunedTag("div");
        tag2.setId("test");
        tag2.setCss("highlight");

        // Equal objects must have equal hash codes
        assertEquals(tag1.hashCode(), tag2.hashCode());

        // Hash code should be consistent
        int hash1 = tag1.hashCode();
        int hash2 = tag1.hashCode();
        assertEquals(hash1, hash2);

   * {@link Multimap#asMap}.
   *
   * <p>In general, two multimaps with identical key-value mappings may or may not have the same
   * hash codes, depending on the implementation. For example, two {@link SetMultimap} instances
   * with the same key-value mappings will have the same {@code hashCode}, but the {@code hashCode}

   * arrays. Like {@code Joiner}, it is thread-safe and immutable.
   *
   * <p>In addition to operating on {@code Map} instances, {@code MapJoiner} can operate on {@code
   * Multimap} entries in two distinct modes:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>To output a separate entry for each key-value pair, pass {@code multimap.entries()} to a
   *       {@code MapJoiner} method that accepts entries as input, and receive output of the form

	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/hash/sha256"
	xhttp "github.com/minio/minio/internal/http"
	"github.com/minio/pkg/v3/sync/errgroup"
)

// Object was stored with additional erasure codes due to degraded system at upload time
const minIOErasureUpgraded = "x-minio-internal-erasure-upgraded"

const erasureAlgorithm = "rs-vandermonde"

// GetChecksumInfo - get checksum of a part.

   * arrays. Like {@code Joiner}, it is thread-safe and immutable.
   *
   * <p>In addition to operating on {@code Map} instances, {@code MapJoiner} can operate on {@code
   * Multimap} entries in two distinct modes:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>To output a separate entry for each key-value pair, pass {@code multimap.entries()} to a
   *       {@code MapJoiner} method that accepts entries as input, and receive output of the form

### Das Problem reproduzieren

In den meisten Fällen und bei den meisten Fragen ist etwas mit dem von der Person erstellten **eigenen Quellcode** los.

In vielen Fällen wird nur ein Fragment des Codes gepostet, aber das reicht nicht aus, um **das Problem zu reproduzieren**.

	if parityDrives < 0 {
		parityDrives = er.defaultParityCount
	}

	if globalStorageClass.AvailabilityOptimized() {
		// If we have offline disks upgrade the number of erasure codes for this object.
		parityOrig := parityDrives

		var offlineDrives int
		for _, disk := range onlineDisks {
			if disk == nil || !disk.IsOnline() {
				parityDrives++
				offlineDrives++
				continue

            int hash = testMessage.hashCode();
            assertEquals((int) largeMid, hash);
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle negative status codes")
        void testNegativeStatusCode() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            byte[] buffer = new byte[256];
            System.arraycopy(SMBUtil.SMB2_HEADER, 0, buffer, 0, 4);