* context class loader will find resources from the class path. In environments where different
   * threads can have different class loaders, for example app servers, the context class loader
   * will typically have been set to an appropriate loader for the current thread.
   *
   * <p>In the unusual case where the context class loader is null, the class loader that loaded

        assertEquals(0, c.getDeclaredMethods().length, "No declared methods expected");
        assertEquals(0, c.getDeclaredConstructors().length, "Interfaces have no constructors");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Fields are public static final Strings with expected values")
    void fieldModifiersAndTypes() throws Exception {

 *  Fix: Don't miss whole operation timeouts when calls redirect.
 *  Fix: Don't leak connections if web sockets have malformed responses or if `onOpen()` throws.
 *  Fix: Don't retry when request bodies fail due to `FileNotFoundException`.
 *  Fix: Don't crash when URLs have IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses.
 *  Fix: Don't crash when building `HandshakeCertificates` on Android API 28.

                    EmptyIterator iterator3 = new EmptyIterator()) {
                assertFalse(iterator1.hasNext(), "First instance should have no elements");
                assertFalse(iterator2.hasNext(), "Second instance should have no elements");
                assertFalse(iterator3.hasNext(), "Third instance should have no elements");

                assertNull(iterator1.next(), "First instance next() should return null");

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},