* the original exception type.
   *
   * <p>This method always throws, and as such should be called as {@code throw closer.rethrow(e);}
   * to ensure the compiler knows that it will throw.
   *
   * @return this method does not return; it always throws
   * @throws IOException when the given throwable is an IOException
   */

You could still use most of the features in **FastAPI** with the knowledge from the main [Tutorial - User Guide](../tutorial/index.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

import okio.BufferedSink
import okio.GzipSink
import okio.buffer

internal class GzipRequestBody(
  val delegate: RequestBody,
) : RequestBody() {
  override fun contentType() = delegate.contentType()

  // We don't know the compressed length in advance!
  override fun contentLength() = -1L

  override fun writeTo(sink: BufferedSink) {
    GzipSink(sink).buffer().use(delegate::writeTo)
  }

      label: How can we reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: additional
    attributes:
      label: Anything else we need to know?

  - type: textarea
    id: kubeVersion
    attributes:
      label: Kubernetes version
      value: |
        <details>

        ```console
        $ kubectl version
        # paste output here

  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see