for (int i = 0; i < numStripes; i++) {
      stripes[i] = i;
    }
    List<Integer> asList = Ints.asList(stripes);
    Collections.shuffle(asList, new Random(0xdeadbeef));

    // do bulk gets with exactly 10 keys (possibly <10 stripes) (or less if numStripes is smaller)
    bulkGetSet = ImmutableList.copyOf(limit(cycle(asList), 10));
  }

  @Footprint
  Object sizeOfStriped() {
    return impl.get(numStripes);
  }

    for (int i = 0; i < numStripes; i++) {
      stripes[i] = i;
    }
    List<Integer> asList = Ints.asList(stripes);
    Collections.shuffle(asList, new Random(0xdeadbeef));

    // do bulk gets with exactly 10 keys (possibly <10 stripes) (or less if numStripes is smaller)
    bulkGetSet = ImmutableList.copyOf(limit(cycle(asList), 10));
  }

  @Footprint
  Object sizeOfStriped() {
    return impl.get(numStripes);
  }

  // +optional
  optional SubjectAccessReviewStatus status = 3;
}

// SelfSubjectAccessReviewSpec is a description of the access request.  Exactly one of ResourceAuthorizationAttributes
// and NonResourceAuthorizationAttributes must be set
message SelfSubjectAccessReviewSpec {
  // ResourceAuthorizationAttributes describes information for a resource access request

For example, let's say you are using version `0.112.0` in your app.

If you use a `requirements.txt` file you could specify the version with:

```txt
fastapi[standard]==0.112.0
```

that would mean that you would use exactly the version `0.112.0`.

Or you could also pin it with:

```txt
fastapi[standard]>=0.112.0,<0.113.0
```

 *       other tests. We want to exclude the other tests (which Android can't handle) while
 *       continuing to run {@code FooTest} itself. This is exactly what happens with {@code
 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code
 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?

  // +optional
  optional string failurePolicy = 4;

  // matchPolicy defines how the "rules" list is used to match incoming requests.
  // Allowed values are "Exact" or "Equivalent".
  //
  // - Exact: match a request only if it exactly matches a specified rule.
  // For example, if deployments can be modified via apps/v1, apps/v1beta1, and extensions/v1beta1,

  // as defined by RFC 3986. Paths must begin with a '/' and must be present
  // when using PathType with value "Exact" or "Prefix".
  // +optional
  optional string path = 1;

  // pathType determines the interpretation of the path matching. PathType can
  // be one of the following values:
  // * Exact: Matches the URL path exactly.
  // * Prefix: Matches based on a URL path prefix split by '/'. Matching is

        assertTrue(map.containsKey("maven-test:t09-b"), "maven-test:t09-b is not in the project");
        assertFalse(map.containsKey("maven-test:t09-c"), "maven-test:t09-c is in the project");
    }

    /**
     * Setup exactly the same as the above test, except that the child project
     * now depends upon d, which has a transitive dependency on c.  Even though
     * we did list an exclusion on c, it was only from within the context of

   * them, so the CN is unused.
   */
  @Test fun verifyNonAsciiSubjectAlt() {
    // Expecting actual:
    //  ["bar.com", "花子.co.jp"]
    // to contain exactly (and in same order):
    //  ["bar.com", "������.co.jp"]
    platform.assumeNotBouncyCastle()

    // CN=foo.com, subjectAlt=bar.com, subjectAlt=花子.co.jp
    // (hanako.co.jp in kanji)

    bits += signifRounded;
    /*
     * If signifRounded == 2^53, we'd need to set all of the significand bits to zero and add 1 to
     * the exponent. This is exactly the behavior we get from just adding signifRounded to bits
     * directly. If the exponent is MAX_DOUBLE_EXPONENT, we round up (correctly) to
     * Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY.
     */
    bits |= x.signum() & SIGN_MASK;