* But it provides you the tools to build simple web applications, with routing based on paths, etc.
    * If you are comparing Starlette, compare it against Sanic, Flask, Django, etc. Web frameworks (or microframeworks).
* **FastAPI**:
    * The same way that Starlette uses Uvicorn and cannot be faster than it, **FastAPI** uses Starlette, so it cannot be faster than it.

	if _, dup := decompressors.LoadOrStore(method, dcomp); dup {
		panic("decompressor already registered")
	}
}

// RegisterCompressor registers custom compressors for a specified method ID.
// The common methods [Store] and [Deflate] are built in.
func RegisterCompressor(method uint16, comp Compressor) {
	if _, dup := compressors.LoadOrStore(method, comp); dup {
		panic("compressor already registered")
	}
}

		if debugPrint {
			fmt.Println("Mux", m.ID, "Handler took", time.Since(start).Round(time.Millisecond))
		}
		if r := recover(); r != nil {
			gridLogIf(ctx, fmt.Errorf("grid handler (%v) panic: %v", msg.Handler, r))
			err := RemoteErr(fmt.Sprintf("handler panic: %v", r))
			handlerErr = &err
		}
		if debugPrint {
			fmt.Println("muxServer: Mux", m.ID, "Returned with", handlerErr)
		}
	}()

    * Mas ele fornece a você as ferramentas para construir aplicações _web_ simples, com roteamento baseado em caminhos, etc.
    * Se você quer fazer comparações com o Starlette, compare com Sanic, Flask, Django, etc. _Frameworks Web_ (ou _microframeworks_).
* **FastAPI**:

Güçlü bir bağımlılık enjeksiyon sistemine sahip olmalı. Kod tekrarını minimuma indirecek bir yol bulmalı.

///

### <a href="https://sanic.readthedocs.io/en/latest/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Sanic</a>

Sanic, `asyncio`'ya dayanan son derece hızlı Python kütüphanelerinden biriydi. Flask'a epey benzeyecek şekilde geliştirilmişti.

/// note | Teknik detaylar

func TestNegativeRead(t *testing.T) {
	// should panic with a description pointing at the reader, not at itself.
	// (should NOT panic with slice index error, for example.)
	b := NewReader(new(negativeReader))
	defer func() {
		switch err := recover().(type) {
		case nil:
			t.Fatal("read did not panic")
		case error:

func TestDontLoopForever(t *testing.T) {
	s := NewScanner(strings.NewReader("abc"))
	s.Split(loopAtEOFSplit)
	// Expect a panic
	defer func() {
		err := recover()
		if err == nil {
			t.Fatal("should have panicked")
		}
		if msg, ok := err.(string); !ok || !strings.Contains(msg, "empty tokens") {
			panic(err)
		}
	}()
	for count := 0; s.Scan(); count++ {
		if count > 1000 {
			t.Fatal("looping")
		}
	}

			if err := tx.First(&User{}, "name = ?", user.Name).Error; err != nil {
				t.Fatalf("Should find saved record")
			}

			panic("force panic")
		})
	})

	if err := DB.First(&User{}, "name = ?", "transaction-block-3").Error; err == nil {
		t.Fatalf("Should not find record after panic rollback")
	}
}

func TestTransactionRaiseErrorOnRollbackAfterCommit(t *testing.T) {
	tx := DB.Begin()

The [GODEBUG History](#history) gives the exact defaults for each Go toolchain version.
For example, Go 1.21 introduces the `panicnil` setting,
controlling whether `panic(nil)` is allowed;
it defaults to `panicnil=0`, making `panic(nil)` a run-time error.
Using `panicnil=1` restores the behavior of Go 1.20 and earlier.

When compiling a work module or workspace that declares

    * 但它為你提供了建立簡單網頁應用程式的工具，以及基於路徑的路由等。
    * 如果你要比較 Starlette，請將其與 Sanic、Flask、Django 等網頁框架（或微框架）進行比較。
* **FastAPI**：
    * 就像 Starlette 使用 Uvicorn 並不能比它更快一樣， **FastAPI** 使用 Starlette，所以它不能比它更快。
    * FastAPI 在 Starlette 基礎之上提供了更多功能。包含建構 API 時所需要的功能，例如資料驗證和序列化。FastAPI 可以幫助你自動產生 API 文件，（應用程式啟動時將會自動生成文件，所以不會增加應用程式運行時的開銷）。