To handle that, we first convert the `username` and `password` to `bytes` encoding them with UTF-8.

Then we can use `secrets.compare_digest()` to ensure that `credentials.username` is `"stanleyjobson"`, and that `credentials.password` is `"swordfish"`.

{* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial007_an_py39.py hl[1,12:24] *}

This would be similar to:

```Python

	if err != nil {
		writeErrorResponse(ctx, w, toAPIError(ctx, err), r.URL)
		return
	}

	// Call site replication hook.
	//
	// We encode the xml bytes as base64 to ensure there are no encoding
	// errors.
	cfgStr := base64.StdEncoding.EncodeToString(configData)
	replLogIf(ctx, globalSiteReplicationSys.BucketMetaHook(ctx, madmin.SRBucketMeta{
		Type:      madmin.SRBucketMetaTypeSSEConfig,

* Deduping of identical events
* Automatic retrying of failed events (configurable)

The above logic is critical to handle correctly to ensure correctness of a controller.
The [Example Controller](../../pkg/kube/controllers/example_test.go) is a key reference point for any controller development;

      for (int insertion = 0; insertion < totalInsertions; insertion++) {
        RandomHasherAction.pickAtRandom(random).performAction(random, sinksAndControl);
      }
      // We need to ensure that at least 4 bytes have been put into the hasher or else
      // Hasher#hash will throw an ISE.
      int intToPut = random.nextInt();
      for (Hasher hasher : sinksAndControl) {
        hasher.putInt(intToPut);

 *   <li>Events for the different listeners are dispatched concurrently.
 *   <li>All events for a given listener dispatch on the provided {@link #executor}.
 *   <li>It is easy for the user to ensure that listeners are never invoked while holding locks.
 * </ul>
 *
 * The last point is subtle. Often the observable object will be managing its own internal state

      assertWrapsInterruptedException(expected);
    } finally {
      interruptenator.shutdown();
      Thread.interrupted();
    }
  }

  /**
   * awaitFullGc() is not quite as reliable a way to ensure calling of a specific finalize method as
   * the more direct await* methods, but should be reliable enough in practice to avoid flakiness of
   * this test. (And if it isn't, we'd like to know about it first!)
   */

			return errFileCorrupt
		}

		left -= read
		if !bytes.Equal(h.Sum(nil), hashBuf[:n]) {
			return errFileCorrupt
		}
	}
	return nil
}

// bitrotSelfTest performs a self-test to ensure that bitrot
// algorithms compute correct checksums. If any algorithm
// produces an incorrect checksum it fails with a hard error.
//
// bitrotSelfTest tries to catch any issue in the bitrot implementation

	case <-w.ctx.Done():
		return 0, context.Cause(w.ctx)
	}
}

// WriterToChannel will return an io.Writer that writes to the given channel.
// The context both allows returning errors on writes and to ensure that
// this isn't abandoned if the channel is no longer being read from.
func WriterToChannel(ctx context.Context, ch chan<- []byte) io.Writer {
	return &writerWrapper{ch: ch, ctx: ctx}
}

				continue
			}
		} else {
			conf, err := libcni.ConfFromFile(confFile)
			if err != nil {
				installLog.Warnf("Error loading CNI config file %s: %v", confFile, err)
				continue
			}
			// Ensure the config has a "type" so we know what plugin to run.
			// Also catches the case where somebody put a conflist into a conf file.
			if conf.Network.Type == "" {

`COMPLETED` only after the replication operation succeeds on each of the targets specified in the replication configuration. If multiple targets are configured to use active-active replication and multi destination replication, the administrator should ensure that the replication features enabled (such as replica metadata sync, delete marker replication etc) are identical to avoid asymmetric state. This is because all replication activity is inherently a one-way operation from source to target, irrespective...