assertEquals(SMB_COM_WRITE, write.command, "Command should be SMB_COM_WRITE");
    }

    /**
     * Test writeParameterWordsWireFormat writes correct bytes
     */
    @Test
    public void testWriteParameterWordsWireFormat() {
        // Arrange
        SmbComWrite write = new SmbComWrite();
        write.setParam(0x1234, 0x5678L, 100, new byte[10], 0, 10);

        // Then
        assertNotNull(address, "Should return address for IP address");
        assertEquals("127.0.0.1", address.getHostAddress(), "Should return correct IP address");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should get all addresses by name")
    void testGetAllByName() throws UnknownHostException {
        // When

 *
 * the access check would fail because the direct ACE has an access mask
 * of <code>0x001200A9</code> which doesn't have the
 * <code>FILE_WRITE_DATA</code> bit on (bit <code>0x00000002</code>). Actually, this isn't quite correct. If
 * <code>WNET\alice</code> is in the local <code>Administrators</code> group the access check
 * will succeed because the inherited ACE allows local <code>Administrators</code>

        // Act
        SamrDomainHandle handle = new SamrDomainHandle(mockDcerpcHandle, mockPolicyHandle, access, mockSid);

        // Assert
        assertNotNull(handle);
        // Verify sendrecv was called once with the correct RPC message
        verify(mockDcerpcHandle, times(1)).sendrecv(openDomainCaptor.capture());
        MsrpcSamrOpenDomain capturedRpc = openDomainCaptor.getValue();
        assertNotNull(capturedRpc);

          .add("aString", aString)
          .add("anInt", anInt)
          .add("anEnum", anEnum)
          .toString();
    }
  }

  /** Validates that the Comparator equivalent we document is correct. */
  @J2ktIncompatible // TODO b/315311435 - J2kt cannot emulate Comparator<C>.<U>thenComparing()
  public void testComparatorEquivalent() {
    Comparator<Foo> comparatorUsingComparisonChain =
        (a, b) ->

	for i, set := range f.XL.Sets {
		for j, disk := range set {
			if disk == f.XL.This {
				return fmt.Sprintf("%d-%d", i, j), nil
			}
		}
	}
	return "", errors.New("format.json is corrupted")
}

func main() {
	var node, args string

	flag.StringVar(&node, "local-node-name", "", "the name of the local node")
	flag.StringVar(&args, "args", "", "arguments passed to MinIO server")

        }
        // We reschedule ourselves with a lock held for two reasons. 1. we want to make sure that
        // cancel calls cancel on the correct future. 2. we want to make sure that the assignment
        // to currentFuture doesn't race with itself so that currentFuture is assigned in the
        // correct order.
        Throwable scheduleFailure = null;
        Cancellable toReturn;
        lock.lock();
        try {

        assertEquals("\\", request.getPath());

        // Test empty path
        request.setPath("");
        assertEquals("\\", request.getPath());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test getPath returns correct formatted path")
    void testGetPath() {
        request = new Smb2CreateRequest(mockConfig, "share\\file.txt");
        assertEquals("\\share\\file.txt", request.getPath());

        request.setPath("newpath\\newfile.txt");

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should have correct constant values for PreauthIntegrityNegotiateContext")
        void testPreauthConstants() {
            assertEquals(0x1, PreauthIntegrityNegotiateContext.NEGO_CTX_PREAUTH_TYPE);
            assertEquals(0x1, PreauthIntegrityNegotiateContext.HASH_ALGO_SHA512);
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should have correct constant values for EncryptionNegotiateContext")

            // This test verifies actual behavior
            testBlock.setFlags((byte) 0x00);
            assertFalse(testBlock.isResolveInDfs());

            // The correct implementation should check flags2, not flags
            testBlock.addFlags2(SmbConstants.FLAGS2_RESOLVE_PATHS_IN_DFS);
            // But due to the bug, this still returns false