Delete marker replication is allowed in [AWS V1 Configuration](https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/storage/managing-delete-marker-replication-in-amazon-s3/) but not in V2 configuration. The MinIO implementation above is based on V2 configuration, however it has been extended to allow both DeleteMarker replication and replication of versioned deletes with the `DeleteMarkerReplication` and `DeleteReplication` fields in the replication configuration above. By default, this is set to `Disabled` unless...

        .containsExactly(0.0, 1.0, 3.0, 6.0, 10.0, 15.0, 21.0)
        .inOrder();
  }

  public void testCopyOf_array_empty() {
    /*
     * We don't guarantee the same-as property, so we aren't obligated to test it. However, it's
     * useful in testing - when two things are the same then one can't have bugs the other doesn't.
     */
    assertThat(ImmutableDoubleArray.copyOf(new double[0]))
        .isSameInstanceAs(ImmutableDoubleArray.of());

     * references (currently executing code, file descriptors).
     *
     * Depending on the usage scenario, this may have some benefit as there won't be any delays for restablishing these
     * resources, however comes at the cost of having to properly release all SmbFile instances you no longer need.
     *
     * @return whether to use strict resource lifecycle
     */
    boolean isStrictResourceLifecycle();

    /**

   */
  public static boolean hasCycle(Network<?, ?> network) {
    // In a directed graph, parallel edges cannot introduce a cycle in an acyclic graph.
    // However, in an undirected graph, any parallel edge induces a cycle in the graph.
    if (!network.isDirected()
        && network.allowsParallelEdges()
        && network.edges().size() > network.asGraph().edges().size()) {

   */
  public static boolean hasCycle(Network<?, ?> network) {
    // In a directed graph, parallel edges cannot introduce a cycle in an acyclic graph.
    // However, in an undirected graph, any parallel edge induces a cycle in the graph.
    if (!network.isDirected()
        && network.allowsParallelEdges()
        && network.edges().size() > network.asGraph().edges().size()) {

	// FIXME: network calls made in this manner such as one goroutine per node,
	// can easily eat into the internode bandwidth. This function would be mostly
	// TX saturating, however there are situations where a RX might also saturate.
	// To avoid these problems we must split the work at scale. With 1000 node
	// setup becoming a reality we must try to shard the work properly such as

   * invoked in the same order as the underlying service enters those states. Additionally, at most
   * one of the listener's callbacks will execute at once. However, multiple listeners' callbacks
   * may execute concurrently, and listeners may execute in an order different from the one in which
   * they were registered.
   *

		//   into memory, any mutation on xl.meta subsequently is
		//   inconsequential to the overall read operation.
		// - xl.meta metadata is still verified for quorum under lock()
		//   however writing the response doesn't need to serialize
		//   concurrent writers
		unlockOnDefer = true
		nsUnlocker = func() { lock.RUnlock(lkctx) }
	}

    } catch (NoSuchMethodException shouldBeImpossible) {
      // Fine: If it doesn't exist, then there's no chance that we're going to be asked to test it.
    }

    /*
     * These methods "should" call checkNotNull. However, I'm wary of accidentally introducing
     * anything that might slow down execution on such a hot path. Given that the methods are only
     * package-private, I feel OK with just not testing them for NPE.
     *

     */
    @Override
    public boolean equals(final Object obj) {