*
 * the access check would fail because the direct ACE has an access mask
 * of <code>0x001200A9</code> which doesn't have the
 * <code>FILE_WRITE_DATA</code> bit on (bit <code>0x00000002</code>). Actually, this isn't quite correct. If
 * <code>WNET\alice</code> is in the local <code>Administrators</code> group the access check
 * will succeed because the inherited ACE allows local <code>Administrators</code>

        // Act
        SamrDomainHandle handle = new SamrDomainHandle(mockDcerpcHandle, mockPolicyHandle, access, mockSid);

        // Assert
        assertNotNull(handle);
        // Verify sendrecv was called once with the correct RPC message
        verify(mockDcerpcHandle, times(1)).sendrecv(openDomainCaptor.capture());
        MsrpcSamrOpenDomain capturedRpc = openDomainCaptor.getValue();
        assertNotNull(capturedRpc);

        // Then
        assertNotNull(address, "Should return address for IP address");
        assertEquals("127.0.0.1", address.getHostAddress(), "Should return correct IP address");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should get all addresses by name")
    void testGetAllByName() throws UnknownHostException {
        // When

		left -= read
		if !bytes.Equal(h.Sum(nil), hashBuf[:n]) {
			return errFileCorrupt
		}
	}
	return nil
}

// bitrotSelfTest performs a self-test to ensure that bitrot
// algorithms compute correct checksums. If any algorithm
// produces an incorrect checksum it fails with a hard error.
//
// bitrotSelfTest tries to catch any issue in the bitrot implementation
// early instead of silently corrupting data.

        handle.close();

        // Verify close was called
        verify(mockHandle, times(1)).sendrecv(any(MsrpcSamrCloseHandle.class));
        assertEquals(handle, closeCaptor.getValue().handle); // Verify correct handle is passed
    }

    @Test
    void testClose_AlreadyClosed() throws IOException {
        // Test case: close() when already closed, should do nothing
        String server = "testServer";

</div>

The command line program called `fastapi` is **FastAPI CLI**.

FastAPI CLI takes the path to your Python program (e.g. `main.py`) and automatically detects the `FastAPI` instance (commonly named `app`), determines the correct import process, and then serves it.

For production you would use `fastapi run` instead. 🚀

      return super.toString();
    }

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 0;
  }

  /*
   * This is somewhat of a weak test; we verify that all of the methods are
   * correct, but not that they're actually forwarding correctly. We also rely
   * on the other tests (e.g., SynchronizedSetTest) to verify that the
   * collection views are synchronized correctly.
   */

  public void testSize() {

        assertNotNull(info);
        assertTrue(info.toString().contains("endOfFile=" + endOfFile));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test getFileInformationLevel returns correct value")
    void testGetFileInformationLevel() {
        assertEquals(FileInformation.FILE_ENDOFFILE_INFO, fileInfo.getFileInformationLevel());

        // Test with parameterized constructor

            // This test verifies actual behavior
            testBlock.setFlags((byte) 0x00);
            assertFalse(testBlock.isResolveInDfs());

            // The correct implementation should check flags2, not flags
            testBlock.addFlags2(SmbConstants.FLAGS2_RESOLVE_PATHS_IN_DFS);
            // But due to the bug, this still returns false

And open the docs at <a href="http://127.0.0.1:8000/docs" class="external-link" target="_blank">http://127.0.0.1:8000/docs</a>.

You will see the automatic API docs, including the paths from all the submodules, using the correct paths (and prefixes) and the correct tags:

<img src="/img/tutorial/bigger-applications/image01.png">

## Include the same router multiple times with different `prefix` { #include-the-same-router-multiple-times-with-different-prefix }