* IP address is returned.
     *
     * @return the text representation of the hostname associated with this address
     */
    @Override
    public String getHostName() {
        /*
         * 2010 - We no longer try a Node Status to get the
         * hostname because apparently some servers do not respond
         * anymore. I think everyone post Windows 98 will accept

        // Verify negotiate context offset is set
        int contextOffset = SMBUtil.readInt4(buffer, 28);
        assertTrue(contextOffset > 0);

        // Skip detailed context verification since we can't access headerStart
        // Just verify that contexts were written
        assertTrue(bytesWritten > 60); // Should be larger than basic negotiate request
    }

    @Test

		// Invalid cases
		{mgmtPrefix: "objprefix"},
		// Valid cases
		{},
		{mgmtBucket: "bucket"},
		{mgmtBucket: "bucket", mgmtPrefix: "objprefix"},
	}

	// Body is always valid - we do not test JSON decoding.
	body := `{"recursive": false, "dryRun": true, "remove": false, "scanMode": 0}`

	// Test all combinations!
	for pIdx, params := range qParamsArr {
		for vIdx, vars := range varsArr {

      src.flat<tstring>()(i) = data[i];
    }
    TF_Tensor* dst = TF_TensorFromTensor(src, &status);
    ASSERT_TRUE(status.ok()) << status.message();

    // Convert back to a C++ Tensor and ensure we get expected output.
    Tensor output;
    ASSERT_EQ(absl::OkStatus(), TF_TensorToTensor(dst, &output)) << line;
    ASSERT_EQ(src.NumElements(), output.NumElements()) << line;

                try {
                    for (int j = 0; j < urlsPerThread; j++) {
                        // Access is synchronized internally in the actual implementation
                        // Here we just verify no concurrent modification exceptions occur
                        String url = "http://example.com/thread" + threadIndex + "/doc" + j;

			}
			if err == nil && tc.expectedParsingErr != nil {
				t.Fatalf("%d: Expected '%v' during parsing but got '%v'", i+1, tc.expectedParsingErr, err)
			}
			if tc.expectedParsingErr != nil {
				// We already expect a parsing error,
				// no need to continue this test.
				return
			}
			err = cfg.Validate(tc.destBucket, tc.sameTarget)
			if err != tc.expectedValidationErr {

        return ImmutableMap.copyOf(map);
      }
    },
    MapMakerStrongKeysStrongValues {
      @Override
      public <K extends Comparable<K>, V> Map<K, V> create(Map<K, V> map) {
        // We use a "custom" equivalence to force MapMaker to make a MapMakerInternalMap.
        ConcurrentMap<K, V> newMap = new MapMaker().keyEquivalence(Equivalence.equals()).makeMap();
        checkState(newMap instanceof MapMakerInternalMap);

                            links.map.put(link, dr);
                        }
                    }
                }
            }
        }

        if (dr == null && path != null) {
            /* We did not match a domain based root. Now try to match the
             * longest path in the list of stand-alone referrals.
             */
            if (referrals != null && now > referrals.expiration) {

     * ToStringHelper} for a given object may change. In particular, the list of types which are
     * checked for emptiness is subject to change. We currently check {@code CharSequence}s, {@code
     * Collection}s, {@code Map}s, optionals (including Guava's), and arrays.
     *
     * @since 33.4.0
     */
    @CanIgnoreReturnValue

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // suite
  @AndroidIncompatible // test-suite builders
  public static Test suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
    // TODO(lowasser): should we force TreeMultimap to be more thorough about checking nulls?
    suite.addTest(
        SortedSetMultimapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestStringSetMultimapGenerator() {
                  @Override