*       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.graph;

import com.google.common.base.Optional;

/**
 * A base class for builders that construct graphs with user-defined properties.
 *
 * @author James Sexton
 */
abstract class AbstractGraphBuilder<N> {
  final boolean directed;
  boolean allowsSelfLoops = false;

        defaultSettings.put("onelogin.saml2.contacts.technical.given_name", "Technical Guy");
        defaultSettings.put("onelogin.saml2.contacts.technical.email_address", "******@****.***");
        defaultSettings.put("onelogin.saml2.contacts.support.given_name", "Support Guy");
        defaultSettings.put("onelogin.saml2.contacts.support.email_address", "******@****.***");
    }

    /**

   * values. Changes to the returned map will update this table. The returned map does not support
   * {@code put()} or {@code putAll()}, or {@code setValue()} on its entries.
   *
   * <p>In contrast, the maps returned by {@code rowMap().get()} have the same behavior as those
   * returned by {@link #row}. Those maps may support {@code setValue()}, {@code put()}, and {@code
   * putAll()}.
   *

```Python
if not (credentials.username == "stanleyjobson") or not (credentials.password == "swordfish"):
    # Return some error
    ...
```

Porém, ao utilizar o `secrets.compare_digest()`, isso estará seguro contra um tipo de ataque chamado "timing attacks" (ataques de temporização).

### Ataques de Temporização { #timing-attacks }

Mas o que é um "timing attack" (ataque de temporização)?

		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusServiceUnavailable,
	},
	ErrSTSUpstreamError: {
		Code:           "InternalError",
		Description:    "An upstream service required for this operation failed - please try again or contact an administrator.",
		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusInternalServerError,
	},
	ErrSTSInternalError: {
		Code:           "InternalError",