verify(mockNdrBuffer).enc_ndr_long(objAttr.attributes);
        verify(mockNdrBuffer).enc_ndr_long(objAttr.security_descriptor);

        // Note: NdrBuffer does not have encode method
    }

    @Test
    void testLsarObjectAttributesDecode() throws NdrException {
        lsarpc.LsarObjectAttributes objAttr = new lsarpc.LsarObjectAttributes();

@GwtCompatible
public final class Futures extends GwtFuturesCatchingSpecialization {

  // A note on memory visibility.
  // Many of the utilities in this class (transform, withFallback, withTimeout, asList, combine)
  // have two requirements that significantly complicate their design.
  // 1. Cancellation should propagate from the returned future to the input future(s).
  // 2. The returned futures shouldn't unnecessarily 'pin' their inputs after completion.

        CIFSUnsupportedCryptoException exception = new CIFSUnsupportedCryptoException();

        // Then
        assertNull(exception.getMessage(), "Default constructor should have null message");
        assertNull(exception.getCause(), "Default constructor should have null cause");
        assertTrue(exception instanceof RuntimeCIFSException, "Should extend RuntimeCIFSException");

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

        // Something was parsed. It's possible the entire string was not consumed but we ignore
        // that. If any of the BROWSER_COMPATIBLE_DATE_FORMAT_STRINGS ended in "'GMT'" we'd have
        // to also check that position.getIndex() == value.length() otherwise parsing might have
        // terminated early, ignoring things like "+01:00". Leaving this as != 0 means that any
        // trailing junk is ignored.
        return result
      }
    }