adminRouter.Methods(http.MethodPut).Path(adminVersion + "/import-iam-v2").HandlerFunc(adminMiddleware(adminAPI.ImportIAMV2, noGZFlag))

		// Identity Provider configuration APIs
		adminRouter.Methods(http.MethodPut).Path(adminVersion + "/idp-config/{type}/{name}").HandlerFunc(adminMiddleware(adminAPI.AddIdentityProviderCfg))

   * example, {@code [] < [1] < [1, 2] < [2] < [1 << 31]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(int[], int[])}.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 9+ users:</b> Use {@link Arrays#compareUnsigned(int[], int[])
   * Arrays::compareUnsigned}.
   */

  fun getContentEncodingConnects() {
    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse(
        headers = headersOf("Content-Encoding", "identity"),
        body = "ABC",
      ),
    )
    val response = getResponse(newRequest("/"))
    assertThat(response.header("Content-Encoding")).isEqualTo("identity")
    response.body.close()
  }

  @Test
  fun urlContainsQueryButNoPath() {
    server.enqueue(

issue](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/issues/48919) for context). If
you want to debug a kernel, you can compile specific files with `-g` using the
`--per_file_copt` bazel option. For example, if you want to debug the Identity
op, which are in files starting with `identity_op`, you can run

```bash
bazel build --config=dbg --per_file_copt=+tensorflow/core/kernels/identity_op.*@-g //tensorflow/tools/pip_package:build_pip_package
```

    public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) {
      if (obj instanceof ContainsPatternPredicate) {
        ContainsPatternPredicate that = (ContainsPatternPredicate) obj;

        // Pattern uses Object (identity) equality, so we have to reach
        // inside to compare individual fields.
        return Objects.equals(pattern.pattern(), that.pattern.pattern())
            && pattern.flags() == that.pattern.flags();
      }

   * array as the lesser. For example, {@code [] < ['a'] < ['a', 'b'] < ['b']}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(char[],
   * char[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<char[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [(short) 1] < [(short) 1, (short) 2] < [(short) 2]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(short[],
   * short[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<short[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

    public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) {
      if (obj instanceof ContainsPatternPredicate) {
        ContainsPatternPredicate that = (ContainsPatternPredicate) obj;

        // Pattern uses Object (identity) equality, so we have to reach
        // inside to compare individual fields.
        return Objects.equals(pattern.pattern(), that.pattern.pattern())
            && pattern.flags() == that.pattern.flags();
      }

 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code double[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).
 *   <li>Has the value-based (not identity-based) {@link #equals}, {@link #hashCode}, and {@link
 *       #toString} behavior you expect.
 *   <li>Offers useful operations beyond just {@code get} and {@code length}, so you don't have to

 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).
 *   <li>Has the value-based (not identity-based) {@link #equals}, {@link #hashCode}, and {@link
 *       #toString} behavior you expect.
 *   <li>Offers useful operations beyond just {@code get} and {@code length}, so you don't have to