`
	var job BatchJobRequest
	err := yaml.Unmarshal([]byte(replicateYaml), &job)
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatal("Failed to parse batch-job-replicate yaml", err)
	}
	if !slices.Equal(job.Replicate.Source.Prefix.F(), []string{"object-prefix1"}) {
		t.Fatal("Failed to parse batch-job-replicate yaml", err)
	}
	multiPrefixReplicateYaml := `
replicate:
  apiVersion: v1

         * created TypeVariable will not interoperate with any JDK TypeVariable. But this is OK: We
         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new
         * TypeVariable to be equal to any _other_ JDK TypeVariable, either, because any other JDK

          + " that.")
  public static int hashCode(char value) {
    return value;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the {@code char} value that is equal to {@code value}, if possible.
   *
   * @param value any value in the range of the {@code char} type
   * @return the {@code char} value that equals {@code value}

   * Math#min(float, float)}.
   *
   * @param array a <i>nonempty</i> array of {@code float} values
   * @return the value present in {@code array} that is less than or equal to every other value in
   *     the array
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code array} is empty
   */
  @GwtIncompatible(

			if allocs != 0 {
				t.Errorf("allocation occurred during write")
			}
			// Check that buffer has correct data.
			if !Equal(buf.Bytes()[0:startLen-readBytes], xBytes[readBytes:]) {
				t.Errorf("bad initial data at %d %d", startLen, growLen)
			}
			if !Equal(buf.Bytes()[startLen-readBytes:startLen-readBytes+growLen], yBytes) {
				t.Errorf("bad written data at %d %d", startLen, growLen)
			}
		}
	}
}

    boolean errorNotThrown = false;
    try {
      SerializableTester.reserializeAndAssert(orig);
      errorNotThrown = true;
    } catch (AssertionFailedError error) {
      // expected
      assertContains("must be equal to the Object#hashCode", error.getMessage());
    }
    assertFalse(errorNotThrown);
  }

  public void testObjectWhichIsEqualButChangesClass() {

 * such custom interfaces directly; they are implemented only in subclasses. Therefore, forwarding
 * {@code equals} would break symmetry, as the forwarding object might consider itself equal to the
 * object being tested, but the reverse could not be true. This behavior is consistent with the
 * JDK's collection wrappers, such as {@link java.util.Collections#unmodifiableCollection}. Use an

			case 11:
				values = append(values, fmt.Sprintf("OU=%s", name.Value))
			default:
				values = append(values, fmt.Sprintf("UnknownOID=%s", name.Type.String()))
			}
		} else if oid.Equal(oidEmailAddress) {
			values = append(values, fmt.Sprintf("emailAddress=%s", name.Value))
		} else {
			values = append(values, fmt.Sprintf("UnknownOID=%s", name.Type.String()))
		}
	}
	if len(values) > 0 {

  }

  /**
   * Returns a contiguous set containing all {@code int} values from {@code lower} (inclusive) to
   * {@code upper} (exclusive). If the endpoints are equal, an empty set is returned. (These are the
   * same values contained in {@code Range.closedOpen(lower, upper)}.)
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code lower} is greater than {@code upper}
   * @since 23.0

   */

  /**
   * Returns an immutable set containing the given elements, minus duplicates, in the order each was
   * first specified. That is, if multiple elements are {@linkplain Object#equals equal}, all except
   * the first are ignored.
   */
  public static <E> ImmutableSet<E> of(E e1, E e2) {
    return new RegularSetBuilderImpl<E>(2).add(e1).add(e2).review().build();
  }

  /**