public class PluginNotFoundException extends AbstractArtifactResolutionException {
    private Plugin plugin;

    public PluginNotFoundException(Plugin plugin, ArtifactNotFoundException e) {
        super(
                "Plugin could not be found - check that the goal name is correct: " + e.getMessage(),
                e.getGroupId(),
                e.getArtifactId(),
                e.getVersion(),
                "maven-plugin",
                null,

     * to "pull in" transitive dependencies of eliminated projects, as for case above, the properly filtered list would
     * be {@code a -> c}.
     * <p>
     * Original code would falsely report {@code a} project as "without dependencies", basically would lose link due
     * filtering. This causes build ordering issues in concurrent builders.
     */
    private List<MavenProject> applyFilter(

    this.name = name;
    this.parts = parts;
  }

  /**
   * The index in the {@link #parts()} list at which the public suffix begins. For example, for the
   * domain name {@code myblog.blogspot.co.uk}, the value would be 1 (the index of the {@code
   * blogspot} part). The value is negative (specifically, {@link #NO_SUFFIX_FOUND}) if no public
   * suffix was found.
   */
  private int publicSuffixIndex() {

# Fess
# ======
errors.login_error = Invalid username or password.
errors.sso_login_error=SSO login process failed.
errors.could_not_find_log_file = Could not find {0}.
errors.failed_to_start_crawl_process = Failed to start a crawl process.
errors.invalid_design_jsp_file_name = Invalid JSP file.
errors.design_jsp_file_does_not_exist = The JSP file does not exist.

# Fess
# ======
errors.login_error = Invalid username or password.
errors.sso_login_error=SSO login process failed.
errors.could_not_find_log_file = Could not find {0}.
errors.failed_to_start_crawl_process = Failed to start a crawl process.
errors.invalid_design_jsp_file_name = Invalid JSP file.
errors.design_jsp_file_does_not_exist = The JSP file does not exist.

      description: "Is the goal of this change a performance improvement? If so, what quantifiable improvement should we expect? How would we measure it?"
    validations:
      required: false

  - type: textarea
    id: learning-curve
    attributes:
      label: "Would this change make Go easier or harder to learn, and why?"

  - type: textarea
    id: cost-description
    attributes:

    private final ModelBuildingResult result;

    /**
     * Creates a new exception with the specified problems.
     *
     * @param model The model that could not be built, may be {@code null}.
     * @param modelId The identifier of the model that could not be built, may be {@code null}.
     * @param problems The problems that causes this exception, may be {@code null}.

package gorm

import (
	"fmt"
	"regexp"
	"strings"

	"gorm.io/gorm/clause"
	"gorm.io/gorm/utils"
)

// Model specify the model you would like to run db operations
//
//	// update all users's name to `hello`
//	db.Model(&User{}).Update("name", "hello")
//	// if user's primary key is non-blank, will use it as condition, then will only update that user's name to `hello`
//	db.Model(&user).Update("name", "hello")

/// note

A path parameter is always required as it has to be part of the path. Even if you declared it with `None` or set a default value, it would not affect anything, it would still be always required.

///

## Order the parameters as you need { #order-the-parameters-as-you-need }

/// tip

This is probably not as important or necessary if you use `Annotated`.

///

      Stopwatch s = Stopwatch.createStarted();
      // here is where you would do something
      total += s.elapsed(NANOSECONDS);
    }
    return total;
  }

  @Benchmark
  long manual(int reps) {
    long total = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {
      long start = System.nanoTime();
      // here is where you would do something
      total += System.nanoTime() - start;
    }
    return total;
  }