},
	}

	for i, tc := range testCases {
		ssec, err := ParseBucketSSEConfig(bytes.NewReader([]byte(tc.inputXML)))
		if tc.shouldPass && err != nil {
			t.Errorf("Test case %d: Expected to succeed but got %s", i+1, err)
		}

		if !tc.shouldPass {
			if err == nil || err != nil && err.Error() != tc.expectedErr.Error() {
				t.Errorf("Test case %d: Expected %s but got %s", i+1, tc.expectedErr, err)
			}

      }
      ArrayList<Integer> nodeList = new ArrayList<>(network.nodes());
      for (int i = 0; i < NUM_EDGES; ++i) {
        // Parallel edges are allowed, so this should always succeed.
        assertThat(
                network.addEdge(
                    getRandomElement(nodeList, gen), getRandomElement(nodeList, gen), new Object()))
            .isTrue();
      }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // threads
  private static boolean trySetName(String threadName, Thread currentThread) {
    /*
     * setName should usually succeed, but the security manager can prohibit it. Is there a way to
     * see if we have the modifyThread permission without catching an exception?
     */
    try {
      currentThread.setName(threadName);
      return true;

    }
  }

  @Test
  fun testRequestInvalid() {
    val call = client.newCall(Request("https://google.invalid/".toHttpUrl()))

    try {
      call.execute()
      fail("Request can't succeed")
    } catch (ioe: IOException) {
      assertThat(ioe).hasMessage("No results for google.invalid")
    }
  }

  @Test
  @Ignore("No results on CI for localhost")
  fun testDnsRequest() {

      assertTrue(at.compareAndSet(prev, x));
      assertBitEquals(x, at.get());
      prev = x;
    }
  }

  /** compareAndSet in one thread enables another waiting for value to succeed */
  public void testCompareAndSetInMultipleThreads() throws Exception {
    final AtomicDouble at = new AtomicDouble(1.0);
    Thread t =
        newStartedThread(
            new CheckedRunnable() {

 * Don't start a new attempt until 250 ms after the most recent attempt was started.
 * Keep whichever TCP connection succeeds first and cancel all the others.
 * Race TCP only. Only attempt a TLS handshake on the winning TCP connection.

   * is permitted and similarly for decrease/remove(). We assume that a
   * setCount() no-op is permitted if either add() or remove() is permitted,
   * though we also allow it to "succeed" if neither is permitted.
   */

  private void assertSetCount(E element, int count) {
    setCountCheckReturnValue(element, count);

    assertEquals(

 * <tt>FILE_WRITE_DATA</tt> bit on (bit <tt>0x00000002</tt>). Actually, this isn't quite correct. If
 * <tt>WNET\alice</tt> is in the local <tt>Administrators</tt> group the access check
 * will succeed because the inherited ACE allows local <tt>Administrators</tt>
 * both <tt>FILE_READ_DATA</tt> and <tt>FILE_WRITE_DATA</tt> access.
 * 
 * @internal
 */
public class ACE implements jcifs.ACE, Decodable {

		t.Errorf("expected at least %v time have passed, however %v passed", expect, elapsed)
	}
	t.Logf("expected at least %v time have passed, %v passed", expect, elapsed)
}

// Test two locks for different resources, both succeed
func TestTwoSimultaneousLocksForDifferentResources(t *testing.T) {
	dm1 := NewDRWMutex(ds, "aap")
	dm2 := NewDRWMutex(ds, "noot")

	dm1.Lock(id, source)
	dm2.Lock(id, source)
	dm1.Unlock(context.Background())

  public static <V extends @Nullable Object> V getDone(Future<V> future) throws ExecutionException {
    /*
     * We throw IllegalStateException, since the call could succeed later. Perhaps we "should" throw
     * IllegalArgumentException, since the call could succeed with a different argument. Those
     * exceptions' docs suggest that either is acceptable. Google's Java Practices page recommends