width: 200px;
	}
	.searchFormBox {
		margin-top: 4em;
	}
	#result .info {
		display: none;
	}
	#result .more {
		display: block;
	}
	#result .description {
		overflow: hidden;
		text-overflow: ellipsis;
		white-space: nowrap;
	}

  }

  public void testOrderedPermutationSetSizeOverflow() {
    // 12 elements won't overflow
    assertEquals(
        479001600 /*12!*/,
        Collections2.orderedPermutations(newArrayList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12))
            .size());
    // 13 elements overflow an int
    assertEquals(
        Integer.MAX_VALUE,

      val increment = (m - n) * (h + 1)
      if (delta > Int.MAX_VALUE - increment) return false // Prevent overflow.
      delta += increment

      n = m

      for (c in input) {
        if (c < n) {
          if (delta == Int.MAX_VALUE) return false // Prevent overflow.
          delta++
        } else if (c == n) {
          var q = delta

    if (!condition) {
      throw new ArithmeticException("overflow: " + methodName + "(" + a + ", " + b + ")");
    }
  }

  static void checkNoOverflow(boolean condition, String methodName, long a, long b) {
    if (!condition) {
      throw new ArithmeticException("overflow: " + methodName + "(" + a + ", " + b + ")");
    }
  }

  private MathPreconditions() {}

              || !fitsInInt(BigIntegerMath.binomial(IntMath.biggestBinomials[k] + 1, k)));
      // In the first case, any int is valid; in the second, we want to test that the next-bigger
      // int overflows.
    }
    assertFalse(
        fitsInInt(
            BigIntegerMath.binomial(
                2 * IntMath.biggestBinomials.length, IntMath.biggestBinomials.length)));
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // sqrt

   * uncached value. This is defined as {@code hitCount + missCount}.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> the values of the metrics are undefined in case of overflow (though it is
   * guaranteed not to throw an exception). If you require specific handling, we recommend
   * implementing your own stats collector.
   */
  public long requestCount() {

        PriorityTrackingBooster.clearExecutionOrder();

        scoreUpdater.execute();

        // Due to integer overflow in comparator, execution order is affected for extreme values
        // The comparator b2 - b1 with MAX_VALUE and MIN_VALUE causes overflow
        List<Integer> executionOrder = PriorityTrackingBooster.getExecutionOrder();
        assertEquals(3, executionOrder.size());

      ).decodeHex()
    serverWriter.writeMessageFrame(OPCODE_BINARY, payload)
    assertData("8232")
    assertData(payload)
  }

  @Test fun serverMessageLengthShort() {
    // Create a payload which will overflow the normal payload byte size.
    val payload = Buffer()
    while (payload.completeSegmentByteCount() <= PAYLOAD_BYTE_MAX) {
      payload.writeByte('0'.code)
    }

0.075);\n}\n\n@media (max-width: 575.98px) {\n  .table-responsive-sm {\n    display: block;\n    width: 100%;\n    overflow-x: auto;\n    -webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch;\n  }\n  .table-responsive-sm > .table-bordered {\n    border: 0;\n  }\n}\n\n@media (max-width: 767.98px) {\n  .table-responsive-md {\n    display: block;\n    width: 100%;\n    overflow-x: auto;\n    -webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch;\n  }\n  .table-responsive-md > .table-bordered {\n    border: 0;\n  }\n}\n\n@media (max-width:...

  public void testOverflows() {
    LongAdder longAdder = new LongAdder();
    longAdder.add(Long.MAX_VALUE);
    assertThat(longAdder.sum()).isEqualTo(Long.MAX_VALUE);
    longAdder.add(1);
    // silently overflows; is this a bug?
    // See https://github.com/google/guava/issues/3503
    assertThat(longAdder.sum()).isEqualTo(-9223372036854775808L);
  }