}

	for i := 0; i < config.Pets; i++ {
		user.Pets = append(user.Pets, &Pet{Name: name + "_pet_" + strconv.Itoa(i+1)})
	}

	for i := 0; i < config.Toys; i++ {
		user.Toys = append(user.Toys, Toy{Name: name + "_toy_" + strconv.Itoa(i+1)})
	}

	for i := 0; i < config.Tools; i++ {
		user.Tools = append(user.Tools, Tools{Name: name + "_tool_" + strconv.Itoa(i+1)})
	}

	if config.Company {

  - type: input
    id: Gpu
    attributes:
      label: GPU model and memory
      description: If compiling from source
  - type: textarea
    id: what-happened
    attributes:
      label: Current behavior?
      description: Also tell us, what did you expect to happen?
      placeholder: Tell us what you see!
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: code-to-reproduce
    attributes:

		Active:   true,
	}}

	if err := DB.Create(&users).Error; err != nil {
		t.Errorf("errors happened when create: %v", err)
	}

	var name string
	var total int
	if err := DB.Model(&User{}).Select("name, sum(age)").Where("name = ?", "groupby").Group("name").Row().Scan(&name, &total); err != nil {
		t.Errorf("no error should happen, but got %v", err)
	}

	if name != "groupby" || total != 60 {

		*GetUser("distinct", Config{}),
		*GetUser("distinct-2", Config{}),
		*GetUser("distinct-3", Config{}),
	}
	users[0].Age = 20

	if err := DB.Create(&users).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("errors happened when create users: %v", err)
	}

	var names []string
	DB.Table("users").Where("name like ?", "distinct%").Order("name").Pluck("name", &names)

One example is when one of the most popular plugins started requiring Java 17 because the underlying framework behind the plugin began requiring 17, and code from the framework was used in the plugin itself.
What would have happened if Gradle was limited to _only Java 11_ at the time?

## Decision

1. The Gradle distribution will never include a Java runtime.
   Instead, Gradle will leverage Java toolchains for the Daemon and worker processes.

        assertNotNull(ex.toString(), "toString should be non-null");
        ex.getMessage(); // don't assert content to avoid implementation assumptions

        // Verify no interactions happened with the mocked cause during construction/access
        verifyNoInteractions(mockCause);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Cause-only constructor with null: null cause maintained")

    /*
     * We need to wait for the runner to exit. It used to be that the runner would get stuck in the
     * busy loop when interrupt threw.
     *
     * While we're at it, we confirm that the interrupt happened as expected.
     */
    ExecutionException fromRunInterruptibly =
        assertThrows(ExecutionException.class, () -> taskResult.get(10, SECONDS));

            lenient().doNothing().when(mockBuffer).setIndex(anyInt());

            message.encode(mockBuffer);

            // Verify key operations happened
            verify(mockBuffer).enc_ndr_small(5); // RPC version
            verify(mockBuffer).enc_ndr_long(0x00000010); // Little-endian / ASCII / IEEE
            verify(mockBuffer).enc_ndr_long(message.call_id);

        // Arrange: pick a value and a mocked consumer
        RequestParam rp = RequestParam.NO_RETRY;

        // Act: pass to the collaborator
        consumer.accept(rp);

        // Assert: interaction happened exactly once with correct argument; no other calls
        verify(consumer, times(1)).accept(RequestParam.NO_RETRY);
        verifyNoMoreInteractions(consumer);
    }

    // useful testable guarantees about the behavior of that dispatcher in a multithreaded
    // environment. Here we simply test that all the expected dispatches happened in some order.
    assertThat(dispatchedSubscribers).containsExactly(i1, i2, i3, s1, s1, s1, s1, s2, s2, s2, s2);
  }

  public void testImmediateDispatcher() {
    dispatcher = Dispatcher.immediate();