* may prefer to invoke that method directly; this method exists only for consistency with the
   * other utilities in this package.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> this method simply delegates to the JDK method {@link Float#compare}. It is
   * provided for consistency with the other primitive types, whose compare methods were not added
   * to the JDK until JDK 7.
   *

   * consistently between their order within {@code valuesInExpectedOrder} and the order implied by
   * the given {@code comparator}.
   *
   * <p>In detail, this method asserts
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li><i>reflexivity</i>: {@code comparator.compare(t, t) = 0} for all {@code t} in {@code
   *       valuesInExpectedOrder}; and
   *   <li><i>consistency</i>: {@code comparator.compare(ti, tj) < 0} and {@code

    return CollectCollectors.toImmutableList();
  }

  /**
   * Returns the empty immutable list. This list behaves and performs comparably to {@link
   * Collections#emptyList}, and is preferable mainly for consistency and maintainability of your
   * code.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> the instance returned is a singleton.
   */
  // Casting to any type is safe because the list will never hold any elements.

   * consistently between their order within {@code valuesInExpectedOrder} and the order implied by
   * the given {@code comparator}.
   *
   * <p>In detail, this method asserts
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li><i>reflexivity</i>: {@code comparator.compare(t, t) = 0} for all {@code t} in {@code
   *       valuesInExpectedOrder}; and
   *   <li><i>consistency</i>: {@code comparator.compare(ti, tj) < 0} and {@code

    return CollectCollectors.toImmutableSet();
  }

  /**
   * Returns the empty immutable set. Preferred over {@link Collections#emptySet} for code
   * consistency, and because the return type conveys the immutability guarantee.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> the instance returned is a singleton.
   */

then <i>A</i> is synchronized before <i>B</i>.
All the atomic operations executed in a program behave as though executed
in some sequentially consistent order.
</p>

<p>
The preceding definition has the same semantics as C++’s sequentially consistent atomics
and Java’s <code>volatile</code> variables.
</p>

<h3 id="finalizer">Finalizers</h3>

<p>

   *
   * <p>Unlike the other {@code EndpointPair}-accepting methods, this method does not throw if the
   * endpoints are unordered and the graph is directed; it simply returns {@code false}. This is for
   * consistency with the behavior of {@link Collection#contains(Object)} (which does not generally
   * throw if the object cannot be present in the collection), and the desire to have this method's

   *
   * <p>Unlike the other {@code EndpointPair}-accepting methods, this method does not throw if the
   * endpoints are unordered and the graph is directed; it simply returns {@code false}. This is for
   * consistency with the behavior of {@link Collection#contains(Object)} (which does not generally
   * throw if the object cannot be present in the collection), and the desire to have this method's

                .filter(rap -> !allAvailableProfiles.contains(rap))
                .collect(toSet());

        if (!notFoundRequiredProfiles.isEmpty()) {
            // Use SLF4J formatter for consistency with warnings reported by logger
            final String message = MessageFormatter.format(
                            "The requested profiles {} could not be activated or deactivated because they do not"

We don't really need to inherit from `HeroBase` because we are re-declaring all the fields. I'll leave it inheriting just for consistency, but this is not necessary. It's more a matter of personal taste. 🤷

The fields of `HeroUpdate` are:

* `name`
* `age`
* `secret_name`