### Is concurrency better than parallelism?

Nope! That's not the moral of the story.

Concurrency is different than parallelism. And it is better on **specific** scenarios that involve a lot of waiting. Because of that, it generally is a lot better than parallelism for web application development. But not for everything.

import org.eclipse.aether.resolution.ArtifactDescriptorRequest;
import org.eclipse.aether.resolution.ArtifactRequest;
import org.eclipse.aether.resolution.DependencyRequest;

/**
 * Helper class to manage {@link RequestTrace} for better error logging.
 *
 * @since 3.9.9
 * @deprecated since 4.0.0, use {@code maven-api-impl} jar instead
 */
@Deprecated(since = "4.0.0")
public final class RequestTraceHelper {

    /**

        logger.debug(indent + artifact + " (not setting artifactScope to: " + ignoredScope + "; local artifactScope "
                + artifact.getScope() + " wins)");

        // TODO better way than static? this might hide messages in a reactor
        if (!ignoredArtifacts.contains(artifact)) {
            logger.warn("\n\tArtifact " + artifact + " retains local artifactScope '" + artifact.getScope()

name: Feature Enhancement Request
description: I want to make an existing feature better
labels: ["type=enhancement"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Filing feature requests is one of the most popular ways to contribute to Guava.


        Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our

</div>

With this feature from **Pydantic v2**, your API documentation is more **precise**, and if you have autogenerated clients and SDKs, they will be more precise too, with a better **developer experience** and consistency. 🎉

## Do not Separate Schemas

Now, there are some cases where you might want to have the **same schema for input and output**.

Но в нашем случае одно и то же приложение **FastAPI** будет работать с API и аутентификацией.

Итак, рассмотрим его с этой упрощенной точки зрения:

* Пользователь вводит на фронтенде `имя пользователя` и `пароль` и нажимает `Enter`.
* Фронтенд (работающий в браузере пользователя) отправляет эти `имя пользователя` и `пароль` на определенный URL в нашем API (объявленный с помощью параметра `tokenUrl="token"`).

 * JUnit constructs the instances.
 *
 * <p>This class is emulated in GWT.
 *
 * @param <G> the type of the test generator required by this tester. An instance of G should
 *     somehow provide an instance of the class under test, plus any other information required to
 *     parameterize the test.
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)

 * JUnit constructs the instances.
 *
 * <p>This class is emulated in GWT.
 *
 * @param <G> the type of the test generator required by this tester. An instance of G should
 *     somehow provide an instance of the class under test, plus any other information required to
 *     parameterize the test.
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)

			// with dead end because tcp-keepalive is not fired when there is data in the socket buffer.
			//    https://blog.cloudflare.com/when-tcp-sockets-refuse-to-die/
			// This is a sensitive configuration, it is better to set it to high values, > 60 secs since it can
			// affect clients reading data with a very slow pace  (disappropriate with socket buffer sizes)
			if opts.UserTimeout > 0 {

Eğer tarayıcınızda şu bağlantıyı:

```
http://127.0.0.1:8000/items/foo-item
```

...`needy` parametresini eklemeden açarsanız şuna benzer bir hata ile karşılaşırsınız:

```JSON
{
  "detail": [
    {
      "type": "missing",
      "loc": [
        "query",
        "needy"
      ],
      "msg": "Field required",