* with node status so we need to check to make sure that
                         * the record type matches the question type and if not,
                         * loop around and try again.
                         */
                        if ( response.received && request.questionType == response.recordType )
                            return;

                        response.received = false;

   * connected - this does nothing and returns false. Otherwise this returns true and the caller
   * should immediately invoke this method again until it returns false.
   *
   * This method may only be invoked by the writer thread. There may be only thread invoking this
   * method at a time.
   */
  @Throws(IOException::class)

might want to separate between installation and activation, it might be nice to allow a user to activate/deactivate a plugin instead of having to uninstall and reinstall a plugin in particular cases. This would prevent having to reconfigure the plugin again. For example it might be nice to turn off LDAP authentication without having to uninstall the plugin.

These particular phases in a plugin’s lifecycle can probably be generalized to all plugins so could be something implemented in all plugins....

* Suggest a new **feature**.

**Note**: if you do it, then I'm going to ask you to also help others. 😉

## Review Pull Requests

You can help me review pull requests from others.

Again, please try your best to be kind. 🤗

---

Here's what to keep in mind and how to review a pull request:

### Understand the problem

    assertTrue("Heap is not intact after remove", mmHeap.isIntact());
    assertEquals((Integer) 10, it.next());
    assertEquals((Integer) 3, it.next());
    it.remove();
    // After this remove, 400 moved down again and 500 up past the cursor
    assertTrue("Heap is not intact after remove", mmHeap.isIntact());
    assertEquals((Integer) 12, it.next());
    assertEquals((Integer) 30, it.next());
    assertEquals((Integer) 40, it.next());

			}
		})
	}
}

// Test PutObject twice, one small and another bigger
// than small data threshold and checks reading them again
func TestPutObjectSmallInlineData(t *testing.T) {
	ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
	defer cancel()

	const numberOfDisks = 4

	// Create an instance of xl backend.

                readBytes.update(acknowledged = unacknowledgedBytesRead)
              }
            } else if (!finished && errorExceptionToDeliver == null) {
              // Nothing to do. Wait until that changes then try again.
              waitForIo()
              tryAgain = true
            }
          } finally {
            if (doReadTimeout) {
              readTimeout.exitAndThrowIfTimedOut()
            }
          }

-   If all looks good, the reviewer will approve the PR.
-   If a change is needed, the contributor is requested to make the suggested
    change.
-   You make the change and submit it for the review again.
-   This cycle repeats itself until the PR gets approved.
-   Note: As a friendly reminder, we may reach out to you if the PR is awaiting
    your response for more than 2 weeks.

**4. Approved**

      L created = supplier.get();
      ArrayReference<L> newRef = new ArrayReference<>(created, index, queue);
      while (!locks.compareAndSet(index, existingRef, newRef)) {
        // we raced, we need to re-read and try again
        existingRef = locks.get(index);
        existing = existingRef == null ? null : existingRef.get();
        if (existing != null) {
          return existing;
        }
      }
      drainQueue();

                        sbuf[7] == (byte)'B') {
                break; /* all good */
            }
                                        /* out of phase maybe? */
                          /* inch forward 1 byte and try again */
            for (int i = 0; i < 35; i++) {
                sbuf[i] = sbuf[i + 1];
            }
            int b;
            if ((b = in.read()) == -1) return null;
            sbuf[35] = (byte)b;
        }