* 次に、質問（大半は質問です）が「明確」か確認します。

* 多くの場合、ユーザーが想像した解決策についての質問になっていますが、もっと「良い」方法があるかもしれません。問題やユースケースをよりよく理解できれば、より良い「代替解決策」を提案できるかもしれません。

* 質問が理解できない場合は、さらに「詳細」を尋ねます。

### 问題を再現する { #reproduce-the-problem }

多くのケースや質問は、その人の「元のコード」に関係しています。

しばしばコードの断片だけが共有されますが、それでは問題を「再現」するには不十分です。

#### Docker runtime Known Issues

- Kernel crash with Aufs storage driver on Debian Jessie ([#27885](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/27885))
  - Consider running the *new* [kubernetes node problem detector](https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector) to identify this (and other) kernel issues automatically.

- File descriptors are leaked in docker v1.11 ([#275](https://github.com/docker/containerd/issues/275))

  * Upgrade Node Problem Detector to v0.4.1. New features added:

    * Add /dev/kmsg support for kernel log parsing. ([#112](https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/pull/112), [@euank](https://github.com/euank))

    * Add ABRT support. ([#105](https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/pull/105), [@juliusmilan](https://github.com/juliusmilan))

      // call to addListener() will callback to setOneValue(), transitively call our cleanup
      // listener, and set this.futures to null.
      // This is not actually a problem, since the foreach only needs this.futures to be non-null
      // at the beginning of the loop.
      int i = 0;
      for (ListenableFuture<? extends InputT> future : futures) {
        int index = i++;

   * share the same connection without sharing the same hostname.
   */
  private var noCoalescedConnections = false

  /**
   * The number of times there was a problem establishing a stream that could be due to route
   * chosen. Guarded by this.
   */
  internal var routeFailureCount = 0

  private var successCount = 0
  private var refusedStreamCount = 0

  /**

     * in any IO with the server. Unlink <code>InputStream</code> value less than
     * the one provided will not be returned if it exceeds the end of the file
     * (if this is a problem let us know).
     */
    @Override
    public long skip(final long n) throws IOException {
        if (n > 0) {
            this.fp += n;
            return n;
        }
        return 0;
    }

    map.clear();
  }

  @Override
  public String toString() {
    return map.toString();
  }

  /*
   * ConcurrentMap operations which we may eventually add.
   *
   * The problem with these is that remove(K, long) has to be done in two phases by definition ---
   * first decrementing to zero, and then removing. putIfAbsent or replace could observe the

    List<?> exp = copyToList(expected);
    List<?> act = copyToList(actual);
    String actString = act.toString();

    // Of course we could take pains to give the complete description of the
    // problem on any failure.

    // Yeah it's n^2.
    for (Object object : exp) {
      if (!act.remove(object)) {
        fail(
            "did not contain expected element "
                + object

**replicate the containers** in the **available machines** taking into account the amount of memory needed by them, and the amount available in the machines in the cluster.

If your application is **simple**, this will probably **not be a problem**, and you might not need to specify hard memory limits. But if you are **using a lot of memory** (for example with **machine learning** models), you should check how much memory you are consuming and adjust the **number of containers** that runs...

    zypper --non-interactive  --gpg-auto-import-keys refresh
    zypper --non-interactive install git-core
    # choose to "ignore some dependencies" of expect, which has a problem with tcl...
    zypper --non-interactive install --force-resolution expect
  SHELL
  suse_common config, name, extra: extra
end

# Configuration needed for all linux boxes