*
   * <p>This method is significantly faster than {@link String#equalsIgnoreCase} and should be used
   * in preference if at least one of the parameters is known to contain only ASCII characters.
   *
   * <p>Note however that this method does not always behave identically to expressions such as:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code string.toUpperCase().equals("UPPER CASE ASCII")}
   *   <li>{@code string.toLowerCase().equals("lower case ascii")}

   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */

 * method equivalent to {@link
 * java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasWaiters(java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)},
 * except that the method parameter must accept whatever condition-like object is passed into {@code
 * callAndAssertWaits} by the test.
 *
 * @param <L> the type of the lock-like object to be used
 * @author Justin T. Sampson
 */
@NullUnmarked
@GwtIncompatible

                    + "NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,\n"
                    + "DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION\\) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY\n"
                    + "THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT\n"
                    + "\\(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE\\) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF\n"

   *
   * <p>This differs from {@code Integer.bitCount(x) == 1}, because {@code
   * Integer.bitCount(Integer.MIN_VALUE) == 1}, but {@link Integer#MIN_VALUE} is not a power of two.
   */
  // Whenever both tests are cheap and functional, it's faster to use &, | instead of &&, ||
  @SuppressWarnings("ShortCircuitBoolean")
  public static boolean isPowerOfTwo(int x) {
    return x > 0 & (x & (x - 1)) == 0;
  }

  /**

   * calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.
   * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link
   * Throwable}. But we <i>can</i> write {@code sneakyThrow(t);}.
   *

      if (currentSubscribers == null || !currentSubscribers.removeAll(listenerMethodsForType)) {
        // if removeAll returns true, all we really know is that at least one subscriber was
        // removed... however, barring something very strange we can assume that if at least one
        // subscriber was removed, all subscribers on listener for that event type were... after

 * Range}, this allows the use of an arbitrary comparator. This is designed for use in the
 * implementation of subcollections of sorted collection types.
 *
 * <p>Whenever possible, use {@code Range} instead, which is better supported.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
final class GeneralRange<T extends @Nullable Object> implements Serializable {

All the **logic** about how to register the URLs for webhooks and the code to actually send those requests is up to you. You write it however you want to in **your own code**.

## Documenting webhooks with **FastAPI** and OpenAPI { #documenting-webhooks-with-fastapi-and-openapi }

   * </ul>
   *
   * <p><b>Examples</b> (all edges are directed facing downwards)
   *
   * <p>The graph below would be valid input with start nodes of {@code a, f, c}. However, if {@code
   * b} were <i>also</i> a start node, then there would be multiple paths to reach {@code e} and
   * {@code h}.
   *
   * {@snippet :
   *    a     b      c
   *   / \   / \     |