Because all the **fields actually change** (the type now includes `None` and they now have a default value of `None`), we need to **re-declare** them.

        FuzzyQuery fuzzyQuery = new FuzzyQuery(term);

        QueryBuilder result = fuzzyQueryCommand.convertFuzzyQuery(context, fuzzyQuery, 1.0f);
        assertNotNull(result);
        // Just check it's a FuzzyQueryBuilder
        assertTrue(result instanceof FuzzyQueryBuilder);
    }

    // Test with transpositions disabled
    public void test_convertFuzzyQuery_withTranspositionsDisabled() {

http://localhost:8000/items/
```

the default of `q` will be: `["foo", "bar"]` and your response will be:

```JSON
{
  "q": [
    "foo",
    "bar"
  ]
}
```

#### Using just `list` { #using-just-list }

You can also use `list` directly instead of `list[str]`:

{* ../../docs_src/query_params_str_validations/tutorial013_an_py39.py hl[9] *}

/// note

import com.google.errorprone.annotations.Immutable;

/**
 * Explicitly named subinterface of {@link Supplier} that can be marked {@literal @}{@link
 * Immutable}.
 */
// TODO(cpovirk): Should we just use ChecksumType directly instead of defining this type?
@Immutable

 * should not fail a test when it does. (The behavior of a {@code TearDown} that throws an exception
 * varies; see its documentation for details.) Use it just like a {@code TearDown}, except override
 * {@link #sloppyTearDown()} instead.
 *
 * @author Luiz-Otavio Zorzella
 * @since 10.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked

* If you are feeling too generous, you can try to **create an example** like that yourself, just based on the description of the problem. Just keep in mind that this might take a lot of time and it might be better to ask them to clarify the problem first.

### Suggest solutions { #suggest-solutions }

Number validations also work for `float` values.

Here's where it becomes important to be able to declare <abbr title="greater than"><code>gt</code></abbr> and not just <abbr title="greater than or equal"><code>ge</code></abbr>. As with it you can require, for example, that a value must be greater than `0`, even if it is less than `1`.

So, `0.5` would be a valid value. But `0.0` or `0` would not.

```

////

...doesn't have any special meaning for **FastAPI**. FastAPI won't use it for data conversion, validation, etc. (as it is using the `Depends(CommonQueryParams)` for that).

You could actually write just:

//// tab | Python 3.8+

```Python
commons: Annotated[Any, Depends(CommonQueryParams)]
```

////

//// tab | Python 3.8+ non-Annotated

/// tip

import com.google.errorprone.annotations.Immutable;

/**
 * Explicitly named subinterface of {@link Supplier} that can be marked {@literal @}{@link
 * Immutable}.
 */
// TODO(cpovirk): Should we just use ChecksumType directly instead of defining this type?
@Immutable

            // otherwise you end up with a wrong server name for kerberos
            // seems to be correct according to
            // https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2009-August/066486.html
            // UniAddress addr = UniAddress.getByName(authDomain, true, tf);
            // SmbTransport trans = tf.getTransportPool().getSmbTransport(tf, addr, 0);