func TestScanRune(t *testing.T) {
	for n, test := range scanTests {
		buf := strings.NewReader(test)
		s := NewScanner(buf)
		s.Split(ScanRunes)
		var i, runeCount int
		var expect rune
		// Use a string range loop to validate the sequence of runes.
		for i, expect = range test {
			if !s.Scan() {
				break
			}
			runeCount++
			got, _ := utf8.DecodeRune(s.Bytes())
			if got != expect {

   * bit(i) can alter output bit(j).
   */
  static void checkNoFunnels(HashFunction function) {
    Random rand = new Random(0);
    int keyBits = 32;
    int hashBits = function.bits();

    // output loop tests input bit
    for (int i = 0; i < keyBits; i++) {
      int same = 0x0; // bitset for output bits with same values
      int diff = 0x0; // bitset for output bits with different values
      int count = 0;

			// ~1.5-3x faster than Rabin-Karp since n is small.
			c0 := b[last]
			c1 := b[last-1] // There are at least 2 chars to match
		loop:
			for ; i < len(s); i++ {
				if s[i] == c0 && s[i-1] == c1 {
					for k := 2; k < n; k++ {
						if s[i-k] != b[last-k] {
							continue loop
						}
					}
					return i - last
				}
			}
		}
		return -1
	}
}

isn't supported\n  const match = find(arr, obj => obj[prop] === value);\n  return arr.indexOf(match);\n}\n","import isFunction from './isFunction';\nimport findIndex from './findIndex';\nimport getClientRect from '../utils/getClientRect';\n\n/**\n * Loop trough the list of modifiers and run them in order,\n * each of them will then edit the data object.\n * @method\n * @memberof Popper.Utils\n * @param {dataObject} data\n * @param {Array} modifiers\n * @param {String} ends - Optional modifier name...

 * same efficient signaling as we had to hand-code in the {@code ReentrantLock} version above.
 * Finally, the programmer no longer has to hand-code the wait loop, and therefore doesn't have to
 * remember to use {@code while} instead of {@code if}.
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * public class SafeBox<V> {
 *   private V value;
 *   private final Monitor monitor = new Monitor();

/// note | Technical Details

It used <a href="https://github.com/MagicStack/uvloop" class="external-link" target="_blank">`uvloop`</a> instead of the default Python `asyncio` loop. That's what made it so fast.

It clearly inspired Uvicorn and Starlette, that are currently faster than Sanic in open benchmarks.

///

/// check | Inspired **FastAPI** to

	}

	for i := range dataDown {
		writers[i] = nil
	}
	for i := data; i < data+parityDown; i++ {
		writers[i] = nil
	}

	b.SetBytes(size)
	b.ReportAllocs()
	for b.Loop() {
		bitrotReaders := make([]io.ReaderAt, len(disks))
		for index, disk := range disks {
			if writers[index] == nil {
				continue
			}
			tillOffset := erasure.ShardFileOffset(0, size, size)

   * iterable}. The iterator's {@code hasNext()} method returns {@code true} until {@code iterable}
   * is empty.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> Typical uses of the resulting iterator may produce an infinite loop. You
   * should use an explicit {@code break} or be certain that you will eventually remove all the
   * elements.
   *
   * <p>To cycle over the iterable {@code n} times, use the following: {@code

		p.errorf("expected identifier, found %q", p.lex.Text())
		return "", "", nil, false // Might as well stop now.
	}
	word, cond = p.lex.Text(), ""
	operands = scratch[:0]
	// Zero or more comma-separated operands, one per loop.
	nesting := 0
	colon := -1
	for tok != '\n' && tok != ';' {
		// Process one operand.
		var items []lex.Token
		if cap(operands) > len(operands) {
			// Reuse scratch items slice.

subtraction due to which coefficients were negated. // 5. Rename x and y to a and n, to capture that one is a modulus. // 6. Rearrange steps 4 through 6 slightly. Merge the loops in steps 4 and // 5 into the main loop (step 7's goto), and move step 6 to the start of // the loop iteration, ensuring each loop iteration halves at least one // value. // // Note this algorithm does not handle either input being zero. if a.IsZero() == yes || m.IsZero() == yes { return nil, nil, errors.New("extendedGCD: a or m is...