baos.write(channel.getRemoteInterface().getAddress().getAddress());
            baos.write(ByteBuffer.allocate(8).putLong(System.currentTimeMillis()).array());
        } catch (IOException e) {
            // Should not happen with ByteArrayOutputStream
            log.error("Error creating binding info", e);
        }

        return baos.toByteArray();
    }

    assertThat(client.connectionPool.connectionCount()).isEqualTo(1)
  }

  /**
   * This is an extraordinary test case. Here's what it's trying to simulate.
   * - 2 requests happen concurrently to a host that can be coalesced onto a single connection.
   * - Both request discover no existing connection. They both make a connection.
   * - The first request "wins the race".

	logger.GetReqInfo(ctx).Owner = owner
	logger.GetReqInfo(ctx).Region = region

	// Do not check for PutObjectRetentionAction permission,
	// if mode and retain until date are not set.
	// Can happen when bucket has default lock config set
	if action == policy.PutObjectRetentionAction &&
		r.Header.Get(xhttp.AmzObjectLockMode) == "" &&
		r.Header.Get(xhttp.AmzObjectLockRetainUntilDate) == "" {
		return ErrNone
	}

  public void testPartiallyConstructedManager_transitionAfterAddListenerBeforeStateIsReady() {
    // The implementation of this test is pretty sensitive to the implementation :( but we want to
    // ensure that if weird things happen during construction then we get exceptions.
    NoOpService service1 = new NoOpService();
    // This service will start service1 when addListener is called.  This simulates service1 being
    // started asynchronously.

		noLog := func(string, ...any) {}

		consoleapi.LogInfo = noLog
		consoleapi.LogError = noLog
		api.Logger = noLog
	}

	// Pass in console application config. This needs to happen before the
	// ConfigureAPI() call.
	consoleapi.GlobalMinIOConfig = consoleapi.MinIOConfig{
		OpenIDProviders: buildOpenIDConsoleConfig(),
	}

	server := consoleapi.NewServer(api)
	// register all APIs

        // So now we have an url of the form file://<path>

        // We want to eliminate any relative path nonsense and lock down the path so we
        // need to fully resolve it before any submodules use the path. This can happen
        // when you are using a custom settings.xml that contains a relative path entry
        // for the local repository setting.

        File localRepository = new File(url.substring("file://".length()));

    }
    for (Service service : services) {
      try {
        state.tryStartTiming(service);
        service.startAsync();
      } catch (IllegalStateException e) {
        // This can happen if the service has already been started or stopped (e.g. by another
        // service or listener). Our contract says it is safe to call this method if

  public void testContainsAll() {
    Range<Integer> range = Range.closed(3, 5);
    assertTrue(range.containsAll(asList(3, 3, 4, 5)));
    assertFalse(range.containsAll(asList(3, 3, 4, 5, 6)));

    // We happen to know that natural-order sorted sets use a different code
    // path, so we test that separately
    assertTrue(range.containsAll(ImmutableSortedSet.of(3, 3, 4, 5)));
    assertTrue(range.containsAll(ImmutableSortedSet.of(3)));

            throws ArtifactResolutionException {
        fireEvent(ResolutionListener.TEST_ARTIFACT, listeners, node);

        Object key = node.getKey();

        // TODO Does this check need to happen here? Had to add the same call
        // below when we iterate on child nodes -- will that suffice?
        if (managedVersions.containsKey(key)) {
            manageArtifact(node, managedVersions, listeners);
        }

	DB.Save(&user1).Save(&user2).Save(&user3)

	rows, err := DB.Table("users").Where("name = ? or name = ?", user2.Name, user3.Name).Select("name, age").Rows()
	if err != nil {
		t.Errorf("Not error should happen, got %v", err)
	}

	count := 0
	for rows.Next() {
		var name string
		var age int64
		rows.Scan(&name, &age)
		count++
	}

	if count != 2 {
		t.Errorf("Should found two records")
	}
}