.Values.configPathmc }} MC_CONFIG_DIR="{{ .Values.configPathmc }}" MC="/usr/bin/mc --insecure --config-dir ${MC_CONFIG_DIR}" {{- else }} MC="/usr/bin/mc --insecure" {{- end }} # AccessKey and secretkey credentials file are added to prevent shell execution errors caused by special characters. # Special characters for example : ',",<,>,{, MINIO_ACCESSKEY_SECRETKEY_TMP="/tmp/accessKey_and_secretKey_svcacct_tmp" # connectToMinio # Use a check-sleep-check loop to wait for MinIO service to be available connectToMinio()...

labels.dict_stemmeroverride_button_download	=	Télécharger
labels.dict_stemmeroverride_button_upload	=	Envoyer
labels.dict_stemmeroverride_file	=	Stemmer Override File
labels.dict_mapping_configuration	=	Liste des cartes
labels.dict_mapping_title	=	Liste des cartes
labels.dict_mapping_list_link	=	Liste
labels.dict_mapping_link_create	=	Créer nouveau
labels.dict_mapping_link_edit	=	Editer
labels.dict_mapping_link_delete	=	Supprimer

    return from(Arrays.asList(elements));
  }

  /**
   * Construct a fluent iterable from another fluent iterable. This is obviously never necessary,
   * but is intended to help call out cases where one migration from {@code Iterable} to {@code
   * FluentIterable} has obviated the need to explicitly convert to a {@code FluentIterable}.
   *

    // array slot is read and written exactly once. However, it can have very poor memory locality:
    // benchmarking shows it can take 7 times longer than the other two in some cases. The other two
    // do n swaps, minus a delta (0 or 2 for Reversal, gcd(d, n) for Successive), so that's about
    // twice as many reads and writes. But benchmarking shows that they usually perform better than

 *       allocating garbage).
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).
 *   <li><i>Some</i> construction use cases force the data to be copied (though several construction
 *       APIs are offered that don't).
 *   <li>Can't be passed directly to methods that expect {@code int[]} (though the most common

   * The order of the elements in the element set is unspecified.
   *
   * <p>If the element set supports any removal operations, these necessarily cause <b>all</b>
   * occurrences of the removed element(s) to be removed from the multiset. Implementations are not
   * expected to support the add operations, although this is possible.
   *

   *       simply switch over to use the JDK implementation wholesale if probable hash flooding is
   *       detected, sacrificing the compactness guarantee in very rare cases in exchange for much
   *       more reliable worst-case behavior.
   *   <li>null, if no entries have yet been added to the map
   * </ul>
   */
  @CheckForNull private transient Object table;

  /**

         * work with all JDK versions, TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable
         * implementation in each of the three possible cases:
         *
         * 1. Prior to JDK 7u51, the JDK TypeVariable implementation interoperates with ours.
         * Therefore, we can always create our own TypeVariable.
         *

          Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society
          under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory
          licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly
          reserves any right to collect such royalties.


Section 3 -- License Conditions.

Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the
following conditions.

  // and appends those labels to the pod template.  When true,
  // the user is responsible for picking unique labels and specifying
  // the selector.  Failure to pick a unique label may cause this
  // and other jobs to not function correctly.  However, You may see
  // `manualSelector=true` in jobs that were created with the old `extensions/v1beta1`
  // API.