// before a result is returned.
//
// Row function - An expression that depends on a value in the
// row. They have an output for each input row.
//
// Some types of a queries are not valid. For example, an aggregation
// function combined with a row function is meaningless ("AVG(s.Age) +
// s.Salary"). Analysis determines if such a scenario exists so an
// error can be returned.

var (

 files for and see if we can't incorporate it all into the POM. Or if we do
 have properties file (something I would like to avoid) say they don't
 contribute in any meaningful way to information in the POM. For example a
 properties file could be used the specify $ so it can be interpolated in
 <developerConnection/> but you couldn't use a properties file to specify the
 version of your project say. Anyway, food for thought to begin with.

# Classes como Dependências { #classes-as-dependencies }

Antes de nos aprofundarmos no sistema de **Injeção de Dependência**, vamos melhorar o exemplo anterior.

## `dict` do exemplo anterior { #a-dict-from-the-previous-example }

No exemplo anterior, nós retornávamos um `dict` da nossa dependência ("injetável"):

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial001_an_py310.py hl[9] *}

/**
 * Tester to ensure forwarding wrapper works by delegating calls to the corresponding method with
 * the same parameters forwarded and return value forwarded back or exception propagated as is.
 *
 * <p>For example:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * new ForwardingWrapperTester().testForwarding(Foo.class, new Function<Foo, Foo>() {
 *   public Foo apply(Foo foo) {
 *     return new ForwardingFoo(foo);
 *   }
 * });
 * }
 *

 * the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern">decorator pattern</a>.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The methods of {@code ForwardingSortedMultiset} forward
 * <b>indiscriminately</b> to the methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link
 * #add(Object, int)} alone <b>will not</b> change the behavior of {@link #add(Object)}, which can
 * lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should override {@code add(Object)} as well,

   * Inappropriate {@code directExecutor} usage can cause problems, and these problems can be
   * difficult to reproduce because they depend on timing. For example:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>When a {@code ListenableFuture} listener is registered to run under {@code
   *       directExecutor}, the listener can execute in any of three possible threads:
   *       <ol>

 * NullPointerTester}, {@link EqualsTester} and {@link SerializableTester}. For example:
 *
 * <pre>
 * public class PackageSanityTests extends AbstractPackageSanityTests {}
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>Note that only top-level classes with either a non-private constructor or a non-private static
 * factory method to construct instances can have their instance methods checked. For example:
 *
 * <pre>
 * public class Address {

   * 'affect' a bit(j) in the output if two inputs, identical but for bit(i), will differ at output
   * bit(j) about half the time
   *
   * <p>Funneling is pretty simple to detect. The key idea is to find example keys which
   * unequivocally demonstrate that funneling cannot be occurring. This is done bit-by-bit. For each
   * input bit(i) and output bit(j), two pairs of keys must be found with all bits identical except

            throw new RuntimeException(e);
        }
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Parses a valid buffer and exposes fields")
    void parseValidBuffer() {
        // Arrange
        String name = "user@EXAMPLE.COM";
        byte[] buf = buildBuffer(oidDer(), name.getBytes(StandardCharsets.US_ASCII));

        // Act
        MIEName parsed = new MIEName(buf);

        // Assert

{* ../../docs_src/app_testing/app_a_py39/test_main.py hl[3] *}

...y tener el código para las pruebas tal como antes.

## Pruebas: ejemplo extendido { #testing-extended-example }

Ahora extiende este ejemplo y añade más detalles para ver cómo escribir pruebas para diferentes partes.

### Archivo de aplicación **FastAPI** extendido { #extended-fastapi-app-file }