public void testRemovalNotification_clear_basher() throws InterruptedException {
    // If a clear() happens close to the end of computation, one of two things should happen:
    // - computation ends first: the removal listener is called, and the cache does not contain the
    //   key/value pair
    // - clear() happens first: the removal listener is not called, and the cache contains the pair

  public void testRemovalNotification_clear_basher() throws InterruptedException {
    // If a clear() happens close to the end of computation, one of two things should happen:
    // - computation ends first: the removal listener is called, and the cache does not contain the
    //   key/value pair
    // - clear() happens first: the removal listener is not called, and the cache contains the pair

        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle mismatched chunk and total bytes")
        void testMismatchedValues() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            // This could happen if the last chunk is smaller
            byte[] buffer = createValidCopyChunkResponse(10, // 10 chunks
                    65536, // Last chunk size (not average)
                    589824 // Total less than 10 * 65536

					if len(listObjectsInfo.Prefixes) == 0 || commonPrefix != listObjectsInfo.Prefixes[len(listObjectsInfo.Prefixes)-1] {
						listObjectsInfo.Prefixes = append(listObjectsInfo.Prefixes, commonPrefix)
						count++
					}
					goto next
				}
			}
			listObjectsInfo.Objects = append(listObjectsInfo.Objects, ObjectInfo{
				Bucket:  bucket,
				Name:    objName,
				Size:    int64(file.UncompressedSize64),

///

/// check

You don't have to worry about performance when including routers.

This will take microseconds and will only happen at startup.

So it won't affect performance. ⚡

///

            baos.write(channel.getRemoteInterface().getAddress().getAddress());
            baos.write(ByteBuffer.allocate(8).putLong(System.currentTimeMillis()).array());
        } catch (IOException e) {
            // Should not happen with ByteArrayOutputStream
            log.error("Error creating binding info", e);
        }

        return baos.toByteArray();
    }

If you check the previous app, in the UI you can see that, up to now, it lets the client decide the `id` of the `Hero` to create. 😱

We shouldn't let that happen, they could overwrite an `id` we already have assigned in the DB. Deciding the `id` should be done by the **backend** or the **database**, **not by the client**.

    assertThat(client.connectionPool.connectionCount()).isEqualTo(1)
  }

  /**
   * This is an extraordinary test case. Here's what it's trying to simulate.
   * - 2 requests happen concurrently to a host that can be coalesced onto a single connection.
   * - Both request discover no existing connection. They both make a connection.
   * - The first request "wins the race".

	logger.GetReqInfo(ctx).Owner = owner
	logger.GetReqInfo(ctx).Region = region

	// Do not check for PutObjectRetentionAction permission,
	// if mode and retain until date are not set.
	// Can happen when bucket has default lock config set
	if action == policy.PutObjectRetentionAction &&
		r.Header.Get(xhttp.AmzObjectLockMode) == "" &&
		r.Header.Get(xhttp.AmzObjectLockRetainUntilDate) == "" {
		return ErrNone
	}

  public void testPartiallyConstructedManager_transitionAfterAddListenerBeforeStateIsReady() {
    // The implementation of this test is pretty sensitive to the implementation :( but we want to
    // ensure that if weird things happen during construction then we get exceptions.
    NoOpService service1 = new NoOpService();
    // This service will start service1 when addListener is called.  This simulates service1 being
    // started asynchronously.