}

  @GwtIncompatible // Math.ulp
  public void testFactorial() {
    for (int i = 0; i <= DoubleMath.MAX_FACTORIAL; i++) {
      double actual = BigIntegerMath.factorial(i).doubleValue();
      double result = DoubleMath.factorial(i);
      assertThat(result).isWithin(Math.ulp(actual)).of(actual);
    }
  }

  public void testFactorialTooHigh() {

    assertEvalsLike(expected, actual, 0);
    assertEvalsLike(expected, actual, 1);
    PredicatesTest.<@Nullable Integer>assertEvalsLike(expected, actual, null);
  }

  private static <T extends @Nullable Object> void assertEvalsLike(
      Predicate<? super T> expected, Predicate<? super T> actual, T input) {
    Boolean expectedResult = null;

            // Note: size() returns 4 + (2*ciphers.length) but encode only writes 2 + (2*ciphers.length)
            // This appears to be a bug in the implementation, but we test the actual behavior
            assertEquals(6, encodedSize); // actual encoded size: 2 bytes count + 2*2 bytes for ciphers
            assertEquals(2, buffer[0]); // cipher count (little endian)
            assertEquals(0, buffer[1]);

# Test Client - `TestClient`

You can use the `TestClient` class to test FastAPI applications without creating an actual HTTP and socket connection, just communicating directly with the FastAPI code.

Read more about it in the [FastAPI docs for Testing](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/tutorial/testing/).

You can import it directly from `fastapi.testclient`:

```python
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
```

        int base = Smb2Constants.SMB2_HEADER_LENGTH + 4; // structure size
        int expected = ((base + 7) / 8) * 8; // expected 8-byte alignment

        // Act
        int actual = req.size();

        // Assert
        assertEquals(expected, actual, "size() must be 8-byte aligned");
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 1, 5 })

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the

//    assertThat(it.handshake()!!.tlsVersion).isEqualTo(TlsVersion.TLS_1_3)
      }
    }
  }

  @Test
  fun testBuildIfSupported() {
    val actual = ConscryptPlatform.buildIfSupported()
    assertThat(actual).isNotNull()
  }

  @Test
  fun testVersion() {
    val version = Conscrypt.version()

    assertTrue(ConscryptPlatform.atLeastVersion(1, 4, 9))

	"X-Minio-Internal-Encrypted-Multipart":                   "X-Minio-Replication-Encrypted-Multipart",
	"X-Minio-Internal-Actual-Object-Size":                    "X-Minio-Replication-Actual-Object-Size",
	// Add more supported headers here.
}

// mapping of replication headers to internal headers
var replicationToInternalHeaders = map[string]string{

      assertEquivalent(expectedResult, collector.finisher().apply(finalAccum));
    }
  }

  private void assertEquivalent(R expected, R actual) {
    assertTrue(
        "Expected " + expected + " got " + actual + " modulo equivalence " + equivalence,
        equivalence.test(expected, actual));
  }

 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */
package okhttp3.internal.publicsuffix

internal actual val PublicSuffixList.Companion.Default: PublicSuffixList