}
	}
	if s.Err() != nil {
		t.Fatal("after scan:", s.Err())
	}
}

// negativeEOFReader returns an invalid -1 at the end, as though it
// were wrapping the read system call.
type negativeEOFReader int

func (r *negativeEOFReader) Read(p []byte) (int, error) {
	if *r > 0 {
		c := int(*r)
		if c > len(p) {
			c = len(p)
		}
		for i := 0; i < c; i++ {
			p[i] = 'a'

   */
  @Test
  fun unacknowledgedPingFailsConnection() {
    assumeNotWindows()
    client =
      client.newBuilder()
        .pingInterval(Duration.ofMillis(500))
        .build()

    // Stall in onOpen to prevent pongs from being sent.
    val latch = CountDownLatch(1)
    webServer.enqueue(
      MockResponse.Builder()
        .webSocketUpgrade(
          object : WebSocketListener() {

    assertThat(adapter.fromDer(bytes)).isNull()
  }

  /** Make the claimed length of a nested object larger than the enclosing object. */
  @Test fun `large object inside small object`() {
    val bytes = "301b300d06092a864886f70d010101050003847fffffff000504030201".decodeHex()
    assertFailsWith<ProtocolException> {
      CertificateAdapters.subjectPublicKeyInfo.fromDer(bytes)

And we as developers keep improving the code as we find those bugs and as we implement new features (possibly adding new bugs too 😅).

### Small Errors Automatically Handled

When building web APIs with FastAPI, if there's an error in our code, FastAPI will normally contain it to the single request that triggered the error. 🛡

    /**
     * The version of this test supplied by {@link MapInterfaceTest} fails for this particular map
     * implementation, because {@code map.get()} returns a view collection that changes in the
     * course of a call to {@code remove()}. Thus, the expectation doesn't hold that {@code
     * map.remove(x)} returns the same value which {@code map.get(x)} did immediately beforehand.
     */
    @Override
    public void testRemove() {

   *         <li>one plus an index into the entries and elements array
   *       </ul>
   *   <li>another java.util.Set delegate implementation. In most modern JDKs, normal java.util hash
   *       collections intelligently fall back to a binary search tree if hash table collisions are
   *       detected. Rather than going to all the trouble of reimplementing this ourselves, we

          // may generate something like <capture#1-of ? extends Foo&SubFoo>.
          // Checking subtype between declared and actual type bounds
          // adds recursive isSubtypeOf() call and feels complicated.
          // There is no contract one way or another as long as isSubtypeOf() works as expected.
          combined.addAll(asList(typeParam.getBounds()));

    /**
     * The version of this test supplied by {@link MapInterfaceTest} fails for this particular map
     * implementation, because {@code map.get()} returns a view collection that changes in the
     * course of a call to {@code remove()}. Thus, the expectation doesn't hold that {@code
     * map.remove(x)} returns the same value which {@code map.get(x)} did immediately beforehand.
     */
    @Override
    public void testRemove() {

        newCapacity = Integer.MAX_VALUE; // guaranteed to be >= newCapacity
      }
      return newCapacity;
    }

    /**
     * Returns a new immutable array. The builder can continue to be used after this call, to append
     * more values and build again.
     *
     * <p><b>Performance note:</b> the returned array is backed by the same array as the builder, so

  using tensorflow::AttrBuilder::AttrBuilder;
  // The string buffers to make sure that any `attr_name` we pass into
  // `builder->Set()` will outlive the subsequent
  // `TF_AttrBuilderCheckCanRunOnDevice()` call(s) on the same `builder`.
  std::set<std::string> attr_names;
};

TF_AttrBuilder* TF_NewAttrBuilder(const char* op_name) {
  return new TF_AttrBuilder(op_name);
}