*
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The methods of {@code ForwardingMultiset} forward <b>indiscriminately</b> to
 * the methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link #add(Object, int)} alone <b>will
 * not</b> change the behavior of {@link #add(Object)}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In
 * this case, you should override {@code add(Object)} as well, either providing your own

	_, err := target.isActive()
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}

	eventData, err := target.store.Get(key)
	if err != nil {
		// The last event key in a successful batch will be sent in the channel atmost once by the replayEvents()
		// Such events will not exist and wouldve been already been sent successfully.
		if os.IsNotExist(err) {
			return nil
		}
		return err
	}

	}

	_, err := target.isActive()
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}

	eventData, eErr := target.store.Get(key)
	if eErr != nil {
		// The last event key in a successful batch will be sent in the channel atmost once by the replayEvents()
		// Such events will not exist and wouldve been already been sent successfully.
		if os.IsNotExist(eErr) {
			return nil
		}
		return eErr
	}

)

// execAndK8sConfigTestCase lets a test case hold some Envoy, Istio, and Kubernetes configuration
type execAndK8sConfigTestCase struct {
	k8sConfigs     []runtime.Object // Canned K8s configuration
	istioConfigs   []runtime.Object // Canned Istio configuration
	configDumps    map[string][]byte
	namespace      string
	istioNamespace string

	args []string

	// Typically use one of the three

		}
		if inlineBlock > 128*humanize.KiByte {
			configLogOnceIf(context.Background(), fmt.Errorf("inline block value bigger than recommended max of 128KiB -> %s, performance may degrade for PUT please benchmark the changes", inlineBlockStr), inlineBlockStr)
		}
		cfg.inlineBlock = int64(inlineBlock)
	} else {
		cfg.inlineBlock = 128 * humanize.KiByte
	}

	cfg.initialized = true

	return cfg, nil
}

     * to be the case). Thus, this test is more of a regression test.
     *
     * Rough instructions to regenerate the test outputs and verify correctness:
     * - Temporarily change this test:
     * --- Comment out assertEquals.
     * --- System.out.println(input + " " + simplifyPath(input));
     * --- fail(). (If the test were to pass, its output would be hidden.)
     * - Run the test.

   * processing and may run concurrently, for example, if the JVM flag {@code
   * -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent} is used.
   *
   * <p>Whenever possible, it is preferable to test directly for some observable change resulting
   * from GC, as with {@link #awaitClear}. Because there are no guarantees for the order of GC
   * finalization processing, there may still be some unfinished work for the GC to do after this
   * method returns.

     * to be the case). Thus, this test is more of a regression test.
     *
     * Rough instructions to regenerate the test outputs and verify correctness:
     * - Temporarily change this test:
     * --- Comment out assertEquals.
     * --- System.out.println(input + " " + simplifyPath(input));
     * --- fail(). (If the test were to pass, its output would be hidden.)
     * - Run the test.

			handlerErr = &err
		}
		if debugPrint {
			fmt.Println("muxServer: Mux", m.ID, "Returned with", handlerErr)
		}
	}()
	// handlerErr is guarded by 'send' channel.
	handlerErr = handler.Handle(ctx, msg.Payload, handlerIn, send)
	return handlerErr
}

// checkRemoteAlive will check if the remote is alive.
func (m *muxServer) checkRemoteAlive() {

    HashCode hashCode2 = Hashing.combineUnordered(hashCodes);

    assertEquals(hashCode1, hashCode2);
  }

  // This isn't specified by contract, but it'll still be nice to know if this behavior changes.
  public void testConcatenating_equals() {
    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(Hashing.concatenating(asList(Hashing.md5())))
        .addEqualityGroup(Hashing.concatenating(asList(Hashing.murmur3_32())))