Let's imagine that you have a database `fake_db` that only receives JSON compatible data.

For example, it doesn't receive `datetime` objects, as those are not compatible with JSON.

So, a `datetime` object would have to be converted to a `str` containing the data in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601" class="external-link" target="_blank">ISO format</a>.

        with:
          # For discussion, see the first setup-java block.
          # The publish-snapshot workflow doesn't run tests, so we don't have to care which version Maven would select for that step.
          java-version: 25
          distribution: 'temurin'
          cache: 'maven'
          server-id: central
          server-username: CI_DEPLOY_USERNAME

   *     the size method
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Collection<T> misleadingSizeCollection(int delta) {
    // It would be nice to be able to return a real concurrent
    // collection like ConcurrentLinkedQueue, so that e.g. concurrent
    // iteration would work, but that would not be GWT-compatible.
    // We are not "just" inheriting from ArrayList here as this doesn't work for J2kt.
    return new AbstractList<T>() {

the problem. If possible, please share a link to or attach code demonstrating
the problem.

**Any other info / logs**
Include any logs or source code that would be helpful to diagnose the problem.
If including tracebacks, please include the full traceback. Large logs and files

   * FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()}.
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): or we could make HOLES_FORBIDDEN a feature. Or we could declare that
   * implementations are permitted to throw IAE if a hole is requested, and we could update
   * test*Hole to permit IAE. (But might this ignore genuine bugs?) But see the TODO above
   * testLower, which could make this all unnecessary
   */
  public static Method[] getHoleMethods() {

        // This test assumes that the AvPair constructor does NOT make a defensive copy of the raw array.
        // If a defensive copy were made, this test would fail, and the behavior would be more robust.
        // Given the current implementation, direct modification of the passed array affects the AvPair.
        // If this is not desired, a defensive copy should be added in the AvPair constructor.

   * our class loader (which could be that of a dynamically loaded web application or OSGi bundle),
   * it would prevent our class loader from getting garbage collected.
   */
  static class DecoupledLoader implements FinalizerLoader {
    private static final String LOADING_ERROR =
        "Could not load Finalizer in its own class loader. Loading Finalizer in the current class "

    private int getMaxChannelsFromConfig(Configuration config) {
        // In a real implementation, this would read from configuration
        return 4; // Default to 4 channels
    }

    private LoadBalancingStrategy getLoadBalancingStrategyFromConfig(Configuration config) {
        // In a real implementation, this would read from configuration
        return LoadBalancingStrategy.ROUND_ROBIN;
    }

openapi_schema = {
    "openapi": "3.1.0",
    "info": {"title": "FastAPI", "version": "0.1.0"},
    "paths": {
        "/a": {
            "get": {
                "responses": {
                    # this is how one would imagine the openapi schema to be
                    # but since the key is not valid, openapi.utils.get_openapi will raise ValueError
                    "hello": {"description": "Not a valid additional response"},

    this.loggerName = ownerOfLogger.getName();
  }

  Logger get() {
    /*
     * We use double-checked locking. We could the try racy single-check idiom, but that would
     * depend on Logger to not contain mutable state.
     *
     * We could use Suppliers.memoizingSupplier here, but I micro-optimized to this implementation