@Override
    public boolean contains(@Nullable Object target) {
      // Overridden to prevent a ton of boxing
      return (target instanceof Long) && Longs.indexOf(array, (Long) target, start, end) != -1;
    }

    @Override
    public int indexOf(@Nullable Object target) {
      // Overridden to prevent a ton of boxing
      if (target instanceof Long) {
        int i = Longs.indexOf(array, (Long) target, start, end);

    @Override
    public boolean contains(@Nullable Object target) {
      // Overridden to prevent a ton of boxing
      return (target instanceof Character)
          && Chars.indexOf(array, (Character) target, start, end) != -1;
    }

    @Override
    public int indexOf(@Nullable Object target) {
      // Overridden to prevent a ton of boxing
      if (target instanceof Character) {

    @Override
    public boolean contains(@Nullable Object target) {
      // Overridden to prevent a ton of boxing
      return (target instanceof Float) && Floats.indexOf(array, (Float) target, start, end) != -1;
    }

    @Override
    public int indexOf(@Nullable Object target) {
      // Overridden to prevent a ton of boxing
      if (target instanceof Float) {
        int i = Floats.indexOf(array, (Float) target, start, end);

    @Override
    public boolean contains(@Nullable Object target) {
      // Overridden to prevent a ton of boxing
      return (target instanceof Double)
          && Doubles.indexOf(array, (Double) target, start, end) != -1;
    }

    @Override
    public int indexOf(@Nullable Object target) {
      // Overridden to prevent a ton of boxing
      if (target instanceof Double) {

dub?v&arekkhar?árekkhár???ksiouf?n&diaegadvoug?taed???v&irp?lesl&am?åm???y&b&essen?nart?sebel?tsev??o&d&ar?na!s??or??gavtsev?k&rajb?sa??lem?mrak?n&art?n&if?orb???r&a&mah?n?v??e&dni?t&so?ton??va??ul?yd??s&am?enner?gav?lrak?tivk??vrejks??ø&d&ar?na!s??ør??gåvtsev?k&rajb?sa??lem?mrak?n&art?n&if?ørb???r&e&dni?t&so?tøn??va??ul?yd?æ&n?v???s&enner?gåv?tivk?åm??vrejks???á&slág?tlá?vreiks??å&gåv?h?jddådåb?lf??ø&d&ob?rav??r&egark?olf??s&dav?mort????aki?i&sac?tal??u??o&b?f?g?hay?o?ttat??r!.&cer?erots?gro?m&...

 * existing users, but it can't *fix* existing users because any users who needed
 * `Function<@Nullable A, @Nullable B>` already had to find a workaround. Still, there is a *ton* of
 * fallout from trying to switch. I would be shocked if the switch would offer benefits to anywhere
 * near enough users to justify the costs.
 *

        },
        "catalan_keywords": {

        },
        "catalan_keywords": {

   * checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to
   * take a principled stand on this, but the amount of such code is simply overwhelming. To avoid

3325          ; mapped                 ; 30C7 30B7     # 1.1  SQUARE DESI
3326          ; mapped                 ; 30C9 30EB     # 1.1  SQUARE DORU
3327          ; mapped                 ; 30C8 30F3     # 1.1  SQUARE TON
3328          ; mapped                 ; 30CA 30CE     # 1.1  SQUARE NANO
3329          ; mapped                 ; 30CE 30C3 30C8 #1.1  SQUARE NOTTO
332A          ; mapped                 ; 30CF 30A4 30C4 #1.1  SQUARE HAITU