* checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to
   * take a principled stand on this, but the amount of such code is simply overwhelming. To avoid

   * checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to
   * take a principled stand on this, but the amount of such code is simply overwhelming. To avoid

rf,c-a-si,?remacytirucesym,s,t&adtsudgniht,emta,?v-morf,w-morf,z,?b&ew&-sndnyd,arukas,draiw.segap,ottad,?ildts.ipa,?c&amytirucesemoh,d-morf,esyrcs,itsalej.omed,n&-morf,vym,?p&kroweht,ytirucesemoh,?q,rievres,s-morf,?d&aerotffuts,e&calpb,ifitrec-&si,ton-si,?llortnocduolc,rewopenignepw:.sj,,tsoh&2a,ecapsppa,??i&-morf,rgevissam.saap,?m-morf,n&-morf,abeht-htiw-si,?s-morf,uolc&-noitatsyalp,hr,iafaw.&d&ej,yr,?nol,?meaeboda,nevia,panqym:-&ahpla,ved,?,smetsystuo,ved&j,pw,??vreser,wetomer,?e&butuoyhtiw,ci...