});
```

## Performance Tuning

### Thread Configuration

```java
// Optimize thread pool settings
crawler.crawlerContext.setNumOfThread(20);           // Number of crawler threads
crawler.crawlerContext.setMaxThreadCheckCount(50);   // Thread monitoring frequency
```

### Connection Pool Tuning

```java
container.singleton("httpClient", HcHttpClient.class, client -> {

 * your HTTP calls. This is because each client holds its own connection pool and thread pools.
 * Reusing connections and threads reduces latency and saves memory. Conversely, creating a client
 * for each request wastes resources on idle pools.
 *
 * Use `new OkHttpClient()` to create a shared instance with the default settings:
 *
 * ```java
 * // The singleton HTTP client.

    String not = new String("a");

    Interner<String> pool = Interners.newStrongInterner();
    assertSame(canonical, pool.intern(canonical));
    assertSame(canonical, pool.intern(not));
  }

  public void testStrong_null() {
    Interner<String> pool = Interners.newStrongInterner();
    assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> pool.intern(null));
  }

  public void testStrong_builder() {

    // Running at time 75, the pool returns that nothing can be evicted until time 150.
    assertThat(pool.closeConnections(75L)).isEqualTo(75L)
    assertThat(pool.connectionCount()).isEqualTo(2)

    // Running at time 149, the pool returns that nothing can be evicted until time 150.
    assertThat(pool.closeConnections(149L)).isEqualTo(1L)
    assertThat(pool.connectionCount()).isEqualTo(2)

    String not = new String("a");

    Interner<String> pool = Interners.newStrongInterner();
    assertSame(canonical, pool.intern(canonical));
    assertSame(canonical, pool.intern(not));
  }

  public void testStrong_null() {
    Interner<String> pool = Interners.newStrongInterner();
    assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> pool.intern(null));
  }

  public void testStrong_builder() {

      // which will call newFuture.setFuture(oldFuture), to allow the next task in the queue to run
      // without waiting for the user's executor to run our submitted Runnable. However, this can
      // interact poorly with the reentrancy-avoiding behavior of this executor - when the operation
      // before the cancelled future completes, it will synchronously complete both the newFuture

 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.crawler.pool;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;

import org.apache.commons.pool2.PooledObject;
import org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.DefaultPooledObject;
import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.container.StandardCrawlerContainer;

    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

        assertTrue(pool.contains(transport), "Transport should be in pool initially");

        // When: Remove the transport
        pool.removeTransport(transport);

        // Then: Transport should no longer be in pool
        assertFalse(pool.contains(transport), "Transport should be removed from pool");
    }

    @Test

    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.