labels.bad_word_link_upload=Téléverser
labels.bad_word_button_download=Télécharger
labels.bad_word_button_upload=Téléverser
labels.bad_word_list_suggest_word=Mot incorrect
labels.bad_word_suggest_word=Mot incorrect
labels.bad_word_file=Fichier de mots incorrects
labels.user_configuration=Utilisateur
labels.user_list_name=Nom
labels.user_password=Mot de passe
labels.user_confirm_password=Mot de passe (confirmer)

	// code generated by the AEAD cipher.
	//
	// Here is an incorrect implementation of IsEncrypted:
	//
	//   return len(e) > 16 && !bytes.ContainsRune(e, '-')
	//
	// An encrypted ETag may contain some random bytes - e.g.
	// and nonce value. This nonce value may contain a '-'
	// just by its nature of being randomly generated.
	// The above implementation would incorrectly consider
	// such an ETag (with a nonce value containing a '-')

<img src="/img/tutorial/body/image03.png">

Você também poderá receber verificações de erros para operações de tipos incorretas:

<img src="/img/tutorial/body/image04.png">

Isso não é por acaso, todo o framework foi construído em volta deste design.

Сложный пример строковых литералов во фрагментах кода: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Хардкор: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | Информация

... Однако кавычки внутри фрагментов кода должны оставаться как есть.

////

			wantErr: policyCondFailedErr,
		},
		{
			name:    "incorrect bucket name",
			fv:      defaultFormVals.Clone().Set("Bucket", "incorrect"),
			wantErr: policyCondFailedErr,
		},
		{
			name:    "incorrect ContentType",
			fv:      defaultFormVals.Clone().Set(xhttp.ContentType, "incorrect"),
			wantErr: policyCondFailedErr,
		},
		{
			name:    "incorrect X-Amz-Algorithm",

////

## Quotes { #quotes }

//// tab | Test

Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'".

/// note

The LLM will probably translate this wrong. Interesting is only if it keeps the fixed translation when retranslating.

///

////

Um exemplo difícil de literais de string em trechos de código: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Pesado: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | Informações

... No entanto, as aspas dentro de trechos de código devem permanecer como estão.

////

  public void testEntrySet_hashCode_size0() {
    assertEquals(
        "multiset.entrySet() has incorrect hash code", 0, getMultiset().entrySet().hashCode());
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(ONE)
  public void testEntrySet_hashCode_size1() {
    assertEquals(
        "multiset.entrySet() has incorrect hash code",
        1 ^ e0().hashCode(),
        getMultiset().entrySet().hashCode());
  }

  public void testEntrySet_hashCode_size0() {
    assertEquals(
        "multiset.entrySet() has incorrect hash code", 0, getMultiset().entrySet().hashCode());
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(ONE)
  public void testEntrySet_hashCode_size1() {
    assertEquals(
        "multiset.entrySet() has incorrect hash code",
        1 ^ e0().hashCode(),
        getMultiset().entrySet().hashCode());
  }

    if not user_dict:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Incorrect username or password")
    user = UserInDB(**user_dict)
    hashed_password = fake_hash_password(form_data.password)
    if not hashed_password == user.hashed_password:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Incorrect username or password")

    return {"access_token": user.username, "token_type": "bearer"}