In this case, it would be better to get **one extra server** and run some processes on it so that they all have **enough RAM and CPU time**.

There's also the chance that for some reason you have a **spike** of usage of your API. Maybe it went viral, or maybe some other services or bots start using it. And you might want to have extra resources to be safe in those cases.

                "tearDownTwo should have been run before tearDownOne", false, tearDownOne.ran);
          }
        };

    final SimpleTearDown tearDownTwo = new SimpleTearDown(callback);
    stack.addTearDown(tearDownTwo);

    assertEquals(false, tearDownOne.ran);
    assertEquals(false, tearDownTwo.ran);

    stack.runTearDown();

    assertEquals("tearDownOne should have run", true, tearDownOne.ran);

* **`300`** and above are for "Redirection".  Responses with these status codes may or may not have a body, except for `304`, "Not Modified", which must not have one.
* **`400`** and above are for "Client error" responses. These are the second type you would probably use the most.
    * An example is `404`, for a "Not Found" response.

* **Uvicorn**:
    * Will have the best performance, as it doesn't have much extra code apart from the server itself.

Do you want to have an `id` and `email` and not have any `username` in your model? Sure. You can use these same tools.

Do you want to just have a `str`? Or just a `dict`? Or a database class model instance directly? It all works the same way.

You actually don't have users that log in to your application but robots, bots, or other systems, that have just an access token? Again, it all works the same.

But `OAuth2PasswordRequestForm` is just a class dependency that you could have written yourself, or you could have declared `Form` parameters directly.

But as it's a common use case, it is provided by **FastAPI** directly, just to make it easier.

///

### Use the form data

/// tip

    * Simple `meshConfig` changes have been approved in the past. Functionality should not be enabled by default.
* For large API changes, 2 members of the TOC must approve the PR before release manager approval in the release branch
  of the istio/api repository. This does not have to wait for the weekly TOC meeting.
    * Risk should be assessed in the PR.
        * Have installs and upgrades affected by this feature?

     *
     * <p>This will be called at most once after all the services have entered the {@linkplain
     * State#RUNNING running} state. If any services fail during start up or {@linkplain
     * State#FAILED fail}/{@linkplain State#TERMINATED terminate} before all other services have
     * started {@linkplain State#RUNNING running} then this method will not be called.
     */

     *
     * <p>This will be called at most once after all the services have entered the {@linkplain
     * State#RUNNING running} state. If any services fail during start up or {@linkplain
     * State#FAILED fail}/{@linkplain State#TERMINATED terminate} before all other services have
     * started {@linkplain State#RUNNING running} then this method will not be called.
     */

{% endfor %}

</div>
{% endif %}

## Top Contributors

Here are the **Top Contributors**. 👷

These users have [created the most Pull Requests](help-fastapi.md#create-a-pull-request){.internal-link target=_blank} that have been *merged*.

They have contributed source code, documentation, translations, etc. 📦

{% if people %}
<div class="user-list user-list-center">