import java.util.List;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;

import org.apache.maven.model.Profile;
import org.apache.maven.model.building.ModelProblemCollector;

/**
 * Calculates the active profiles among a given collection of profiles.
 *
 * @deprecated use {@link org.apache.maven.api.services.ModelBuilder} instead
 */
@Deprecated(since = "4.0.0")
public interface ProfileSelector {

    /**

    /**
     * Resolves the transitive dependencies of the specified projects. Note that dependencies which can't be resolved
     * from any repository but are present among the set of specified projects will not cause an exception. Instead,
     * those unresolved artifacts will be returned in the result set, allowing the caller to take special care of
     * artifacts that haven't been build yet.
     *

  // Required.
  optional PriorityLevelConfigurationReference priorityLevelConfiguration = 1;

  // `matchingPrecedence` is used to choose among the FlowSchemas that match a given request. The chosen
  // FlowSchema is among those with the numerically lowest (which we take to be logically highest)
  // MatchingPrecedence.  Each MatchingPrecedence value must be ranged in [1,10000].

   * create, cache and return" pattern. For further improvements, use {@link LoadingCache} and its
   * {@link LoadingCache#get(Object) get(K)} method instead of this one.
   *
   * <p>Among the improvements that this method and {@code LoadingCache.get(K)} both provide are:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@linkplain LoadingCache#get(Object) awaiting the result of a pending load} rather than

    }

    /**
     * Filter out whitelisted projects with a big twist:
     * Assume we have all projects {@code a, b, c} while active are {@code a, c} and relation among all projects
     * is {@code a -> b -> c}. This method handles well the case for transitive list. But, for non-transitive we need

## Benchmarks and speed

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

        if (expectedClass.isInstance(failure)) {
          found = true
          break
        }
      }
      assertThat(
        found,
        "Expected exception type among ${allowedExceptionTypes.contentToString()}, got $failure",
      ).isTrue()
    }

  fun assertFailure(vararg messages: String) =
    apply {
      assertThat(failure, "No failure found").isNotNull()

  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if the provided keys are among the keys provided when the table was
   * constructed.
   */
  @Override
  public boolean contains(@CheckForNull Object rowKey, @CheckForNull Object columnKey) {
    return containsRow(rowKey) && containsColumn(columnKey);
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if the provided column key is among the column keys provided when the
   * table was constructed.

  // Required.
  optional PriorityLevelConfigurationReference priorityLevelConfiguration = 1;

  // `matchingPrecedence` is used to choose among the FlowSchemas that match a given request. The chosen
  // FlowSchema is among those with the numerically lowest (which we take to be logically highest)
  // MatchingPrecedence.  Each MatchingPrecedence value must be ranged in [1,10000].

  // Required.
  optional PriorityLevelConfigurationReference priorityLevelConfiguration = 1;

  // `matchingPrecedence` is used to choose among the FlowSchemas that match a given request. The chosen
  // FlowSchema is among those with the numerically lowest (which we take to be logically highest)
  // MatchingPrecedence.  Each MatchingPrecedence value must be ranged in [1,10000].