runnables = null; // allow GC to free listeners even if this stays around for a while.
      }
      while (list != null) {
        executeListener(list.runnable, list.executor);
        list = list.next;
      }
    }

    private static void executeListener(Runnable runnable, Executor executor) {
      try {
        executor.execute(runnable);
      } catch (RuntimeException e) {
        log.log(

        runnables = null; // allow GC to free listeners even if this stays around for a while.
      }
      while (list != null) {
        executeListener(list.runnable, list.executor);
        list = list.next;
      }
    }

    private static void executeListener(Runnable runnable, Executor executor) {
      try {
        executor.execute(runnable);
      } catch (RuntimeException e) {
        log.log(

    // some of the previously added runnables, but we're OK with that. If we want to change the
    // contract to guarantee ordering among runnables we'd have to modify the logic here to allow
    // it.
    executeListener(runnable, executor);
  }

  /**
   * Runs this execution list, executing all existing pairs in the order they were added. However,

     * AbstractFuture.executeListener to do so, since that method would have the ability to continue
     * to execute other listeners.
     *
     * What about RuntimeException? If there is a bug in set()/setValue() that produces one, it will
     * propagate, too, but only as far as AbstractFuture.executeListener, which will catch and log
     * it.
     */
    setResult(transformResult);

        } while (oldHead != Listener.TOMBSTONE);
      }
    }
    // If we get here then the Listener TOMBSTONE was set, which means the future is done, call
    // the listener.
    executeListener(listener, executor);
  }

  /**
   * Sets the result of this {@code Future} unless this {@code Future} has already been cancelled or