import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Simple benchmark: create, start, read. This does not currently report the most useful result
 * because it's ambiguous to what extent the stopwatch benchmark is being affected by GC.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class StopwatchBenchmark {
  @Benchmark
  long stopwatch(int reps) {
    long total = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {

     *
     * @return the action triggering this entry (FILE_ACTION_*)
     */
    int getAction();

    /**
     * Gets the name of the file affected by the action.
     *
     * @return the file name affected by the action
     */
    String getFileName();

<!--- and make sure you have followed https://github.com/minio/minio/tree/release/docs/debugging to capture relevant logs -->

1.
2.
3.
4.

## Context
<!--- How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish? -->
<!--- Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world -->

## Regression
<!-- Is this issue a regression? (Yes / No) -->

Date:   Wed Nov 17 15:49:12 2021 -0800

    heal legacy objects when versioning is enabled after upgrade (#13671)
```

- A security fix must be backported if a customer is affected by it, we have a mechanism in SUBNET to send out notifications to affected customers in such situations, this is a mandatory requirement.

```
commit 99bf4d0c429f04dbd013ba98840d07b759ae1702 (tag: RELEASE.2019-06-15T23-07-18Z)

        // Ensure the AvPair's internal raw array is not affected (defensive copy not made)
        // This test assumes that the AvPair constructor does NOT make a defensive copy of the raw array.
        // If a defensive copy were made, this test would fail, and the behavior would be more robust.
        // Given the current implementation, direct modification of the passed array affects the AvPair.

    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:
      required: false
  - type: textarea
    id: steps-to-reproduce

		t.Fatalf("member id is not equal: expects: %v, got: %v", 100, profile2.MemberID)
	}

	if r := DB.Delete(&member); r.Error != nil || r.RowsAffected != 1 {
		t.Fatalf("Should delete member, got error: %v, affected: %v", r.Error, r.RowsAffected)
	}

	var result Member
	if err := DB.First(&result, member.ID).Error; err == nil {
		t.Fatalf("Should not find deleted member")
	}

    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:
      required: false
  - type: textarea
    id: steps-to-reproduce

            Thread.interrupted();
            if (interruptingThread.isAlive()) {
              // This will be hidden by test-output redirection:
              logger.severe("InterruptenatorTask did not exit; future tests may be affected");
              /*
               * This won't do any good under JUnit 3, but I'll leave it around in
               * case we ever switch to JUnit 4:
               */
              fail();
            }

            Thread.interrupted();
            if (interruptingThread.isAlive()) {
              // This will be hidden by test-output redirection:
              logger.severe("InterruptenatorTask did not exit; future tests may be affected");
              /*
               * This won't do any good under JUnit 3, but I'll leave it around in
               * case we ever switch to JUnit 4:
               */
              fail();
            }